Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Polestar 4
Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 22 min, Polestar 4 30 min · DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Polestar 4 200 kW · Consumption — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 15.3 kWh/100 km, Polestar 4 17.8 kWh/100 km.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Polestar 4
The Polestar 4 is a D-segment SUV that offers high power in the Dual Motor version and a long range in the Single Motor configuration.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Polestar 4
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Polestar 4Rear Motor
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Polestar 4 — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 9 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +59 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +0.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −2.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +34 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +70 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −8 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −30 kg
- Boot lPolestar 4 +15 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Polestar 4
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Polestar 4 Rear Motor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 620 km | Audi +59 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 94 kWh | Audi +0.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 17.8 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 200 kW | Audi +70 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 30 min | Audi −8 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 14.5 km/min | Audi +7.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 272 PS | Audi +34 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.1 s | Audi −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2230 kg | Audi −30 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 526 l | Polestar +15 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Polestar |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4839 mm | Polestar +68 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 2008 mm | Polestar +69 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1544 mm | Audi +67 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2999 mm | Polestar +106 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Polestar 4
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Polestar 4?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 620 km of the Polestar 4. That is a difference of 59 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Polestar 4 — its 94 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Polestar 4 up to 200 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 22 and 30 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron uses less electricity: 15.3 kWh/100 km against 17.8 kWh/100 km in the Polestar 4. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 375 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.