Elaris BEO vs Polestar 4

Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Polestar 4 200 kW · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Polestar 4 272 PS · Top speed — Elaris BEO 150 km/h, Polestar 4 200 km/h.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Polestar 4

The Polestar 4 is a D-segment SUV that offers high power in the Dual Motor version and a long range in the Single Motor configuration.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Polestar 4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Polestar 4 — who wins where

Polestar 4 leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPolestar 4 +131 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Polestar 4
    620
  • Battery kWhPolestar 4 +8 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Polestar 4
    94
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmPolestar 4 −1.5 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Polestar 4
    17.8
  • Power PSPolestar 4 +68 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Polestar 4
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Polestar 4
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hPolestar 4 +50 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Polestar 4
    200
  • DC charging kWPolestar 4 +100 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Polestar 4
    200
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Polestar 4
    11
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −275 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Polestar 4
    2230
  • Boot lPolestar 4 +59 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Polestar 4
    526

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Polestar 4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Polestar 4
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Polestar 4
Rear Motor
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km620 kmPolestar +131 km
Battery86 kWh94 kWhPolestar +8 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km17.8 kWh/100 kmPolestar −1.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW200 kWPolestar +100 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 20–80%30 min 10–80%15 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min14.5 km/minPolestar +8 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS272 PSPolestar +68 PS
0–100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed150 km/h200 km/hPolestar +50 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1955 kg2230 kgElaris −275 kg
Boot467 l526 lPolestar +59 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Polestar
Length4698 mm4839 mmPolestar +141 mm
Width1908 mm2008 mmPolestar +100 mm
Height1696 mm1544 mmElaris +152 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2999 mmPolestar +199 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Polestar 4

Cost per 100 km5.34
Monthly67
Yearly801

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Polestar 4

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Polestar 4?

The Polestar 4 goes further: 620 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 131 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Polestar 4 differ?

The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Polestar 4 has RWD and 272 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Polestar 4 — its 94 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Elaris BEO or Polestar 4?

The Polestar 4 is stronger: 272 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 68 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.