Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs MG IM6
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, MG IM6 396 kW · Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, MG IM6 407 PS · Boot — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 511 l, MG IM6 665 l.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
MG IM6
The MG IM6 is a D-segment SUV offering high engine power and fast DC charging capabilities of up to 396 kW.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs MG IM6
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
MG IM6Premium
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or MG IM6 — who wins where
MG IM6 leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +54 km
- Battery kWhMG IM6 +1.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −2.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMG IM6 +101 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMG IM6 −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hMG IM6 +25 km/h
- DC charging kWMG IM6 +126 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minMG IM6 −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −120 kg
- Boot lMG IM6 +154 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs MG IM6
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | MG IM6 Premium | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 625 km | Audi +54 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 96.5 kWh | MG +1.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 18.2 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 396 kW | MG +126 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 17 min | MG −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 25.7 km/min | MG +4.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 407 PS | MG +101 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 5.4 s | MG −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 235 km/h | MG +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2320 kg | Audi −120 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 665 l | MG +154 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only MG |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4904 mm | MG +133 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1988 mm | MG +49 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1669 mm | MG +58 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2950 mm | MG +57 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
MG IM6
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or MG IM6?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 625 km of the MG IM6. That is a difference of 54 km.
Why does the MG IM6 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron?
The MG IM6 carries 96.5 kWh and covers 625 km, while the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron with its 94.9 kWh battery does 679 km. Energy use decides it: 18.2 against 15.3 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the MG IM6 — its 96.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The MG IM6 takes more: 665 l against 511 l in the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron. The difference is 154 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.