MG IM6 vs Polestar 4

Biggest differences: DC charging — MG IM6 396 kW, Polestar 4 200 kW · Charging 10–80% — MG IM6 17 min, Polestar 4 30 min · Power — MG IM6 407 PS, Polestar 4 272 PS.

MG IM6

The MG IM6 is a D-segment SUV offering high engine power and fast DC charging capabilities of up to 396 kW.

Polestar 4

The Polestar 4 is a D-segment SUV that offers high power in the Dual Motor version and a long range in the Single Motor configuration.

Profile against the market: MG IM6 vs Polestar 4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

MG IM6 or Polestar 4 — who wins where

MG IM6 leads 8 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMG IM6 +5 km
    MG IM6
    625
    Polestar 4
    620
  • Battery kWhMG IM6 +2.5 kWh
    MG IM6
    96.5
    Polestar 4
    94
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmPolestar 4 −0.4 kWh/100 km
    MG IM6
    18.2
    Polestar 4
    17.8
  • Power PSMG IM6 +135 PS
    MG IM6
    407
    Polestar 4
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sMG IM6 −1.7 s
    MG IM6
    5.4
    Polestar 4
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hMG IM6 +35 km/h
    MG IM6
    235
    Polestar 4
    200
  • DC charging kWMG IM6 +196 kW
    MG IM6
    396
    Polestar 4
    200
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    MG IM6
    11
    Polestar 4
    11
  • Charging minMG IM6 −13 min
    MG IM6
    17
    Polestar 4
    30
  • Weight kgPolestar 4 −90 kg
    MG IM6
    2320
    Polestar 4
    2230
  • Boot lMG IM6 +139 l
    MG IM6
    665
    Polestar 4
    526

Add a third car

Technical data: MG IM6 vs Polestar 4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: MG IM6 vs Polestar 4
Key parameters MG IM6
Premium
Polestar 4
Rear Motor
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range625 km620 kmMG +5 km
Battery96.5 kWh94 kWhMG +2.5 kWh
Consumption18.2 kWh/100 km17.8 kWh/100 kmPolestar −0.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging396 kW200 kWMG +196 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%17 min30 minMG −13 min
Range per minute of charging25.7 km/min14.5 km/minMG +11.2 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VMG +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power407 PS272 PSMG +135 PS
0–100 km/h5.4 s7.1 sMG −1.7 s
Top speed235 km/h200 km/hMG +35 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2320 kg2230 kgPolestar −90 kg
Boot665 l526 lMG +139 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4904 mm4839 mmMG +65 mm
Width1988 mm2008 mmPolestar +20 mm
Height1669 mm1544 mmMG +125 mm
Wheelbase2950 mm2999 mmPolestar +49 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

MG IM6

Cost per 100 km5.46
Monthly68
Yearly819

Polestar 4

Cost per 100 km5.34
Monthly67
Yearly801

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

MG IM6

Polestar 4

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which is more powerful — MG IM6 or Polestar 4?

The MG IM6 is stronger: 407 PS against the 272 PS of the Polestar 4. The gap is 135 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The MG IM6 takes more: 665 l against 526 l in the Polestar 4. The difference is 139 l.

Which charges faster?

The MG IM6 accepts up to 396 kW DC, the Polestar 4 up to 200 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 17 and 30 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Polestar 4 uses less electricity: 17.8 kWh/100 km against 18.2 kWh/100 km in the MG IM6. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 60 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.