Ford Capri vs MG IM6

Biggest differences: DC charging — Ford Capri 183 kW, MG IM6 396 kW · Charging 10–80% — Ford Capri 29 min, MG IM6 17 min · Power — Ford Capri 286 PS, MG IM6 407 PS.

Ford Capri

The Ford Capri is a D-segment SUV offering three variants with rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, and a range of up to 627 kilometers.

MG IM6

The MG IM6 is a D-segment SUV offering high engine power and fast DC charging capabilities of up to 396 kW.

Profile against the market: Ford Capri vs MG IM6

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Ford Capri or MG IM6 — who wins where

MG IM6 leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmFord Capri +2 km
    Ford Capri
    627
    MG IM6
    625
  • Battery kWhMG IM6 +17.5 kWh
    Ford Capri
    79
    MG IM6
    96.5
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmFord Capri −4.4 kWh/100 km
    Ford Capri
    13.8
    MG IM6
    18.2
  • Power PSMG IM6 +121 PS
    Ford Capri
    286
    MG IM6
    407
  • 0–100 km/h sMG IM6 −1 s
    Ford Capri
    6.4
    MG IM6
    5.4
  • Top speed km/hMG IM6 +55 km/h
    Ford Capri
    180
    MG IM6
    235
  • DC charging kWMG IM6 +213 kW
    Ford Capri
    183
    MG IM6
    396
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Ford Capri
    11
    MG IM6
    11
  • Charging minMG IM6 −12 min
    Ford Capri
    29
    MG IM6
    17
  • Weight kgFord Capri −297 kg
    Ford Capri
    2023
    MG IM6
    2320
  • Boot lMG IM6 +93 l
    Ford Capri
    572
    MG IM6
    665

Add a third car

Technical data: Ford Capri vs MG IM6

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Ford Capri vs MG IM6
Key parameters Ford Capri
Extended Range RWD
MG IM6
Premium
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range627 km625 kmFord +2 km
Battery79 kWh96.5 kWhMG +17.5 kWh
Consumption13.8 kWh/100 km18.2 kWh/100 kmFord −4.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW396 kWMG +213 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%29 min17 minMG −12 min
Range per minute of charging15.1 km/min25.7 km/minMG +10.6 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VMG +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS407 PSMG +121 PS
0–100 km/h6.4 s5.4 sMG −1 s
Top speed180 km/h235 km/hMG +55 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2023 kg2320 kgFord −297 kg
Boot572 l665 lMG +93 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4634 mm4904 mmMG +270 mm
Width1872 mm1988 mmMG +116 mm
Height1627 mm1669 mmMG +42 mm
Wheelbase2767 mm2950 mmMG +183 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Ford Capri

Cost per 100 km4.14
Monthly52
Yearly621

MG IM6

Cost per 100 km5.46
Monthly68
Yearly819

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Ford Capri

MG IM6

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the MG IM6 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Ford Capri?

The MG IM6 carries 96.5 kWh and covers 625 km, while the Ford Capri with its 79 kWh battery does 627 km. Energy use decides it: 18.2 against 13.8 kWh/100 km.

Which is more powerful — Ford Capri or MG IM6?

The MG IM6 is stronger: 407 PS against the 286 PS of the Ford Capri. The gap is 121 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The MG IM6 takes more: 665 l against 572 l in the Ford Capri. The difference is 93 l.

Which charges faster?

The Ford Capri accepts up to 183 kW DC, the MG IM6 up to 396 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 17 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.