Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs BYD Sealion 7
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, BYD Sealion 7 150 kW · Charging 10–80% — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 22 min, BYD Sealion 7 32 min · WLTP range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 679 km, BYD Sealion 7 482 km.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
BYD Sealion 7
This electric SUV, belonging to the D-segment, offers two powertrain options with power ranging from 312 horsepower to 530 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs BYD Sealion 7
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
BYD Sealion 7Comfort RWD
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or BYD Sealion 7 — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +197 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +12.4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −4.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBYD Sealion 7 +6 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hBYD Sealion 7 +5 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +120 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −10 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −25 kg
- Boot lBYD Sealion 7 +9 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs BYD Sealion 7
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | BYD Sealion 7 Comfort RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 482 km | Audi +197 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 82.5 kWh | Audi +12.4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 19.9 kWh/100 km | Audi −4.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 150 kW | Audi +120 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 32 min | Audi −10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 10.5 km/min | Audi +11.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 312 PS | BYD +6 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 6.7 s | Audi −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 215 km/h | BYD +5 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2225 kg | Audi −25 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 520 l | BYD +9 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only BYD |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4830 mm | BYD +59 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1925 mm | Audi +14 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1620 mm | BYD +9 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2930 mm | BYD +37 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
BYD Sealion 7
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
BYD Sealion 7
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or BYD Sealion 7?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 482 km of the BYD Sealion 7. That is a difference of 197 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the BYD Sealion 7 — its 82.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the BYD Sealion 7 up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 22 and 32 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron uses less electricity: 15.3 kWh/100 km against 19.9 kWh/100 km in the BYD Sealion 7. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 690 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.