Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs BMW iX3
Biggest differences: Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, BMW iX3 469 PS · DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, BMW iX3 400 kW · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 6.6 s, BMW iX3 4.9 s.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
BMW iX3
The BMW iX3 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering two drive variants with a range of up to 805 km according to the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs BMW iX3
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
BMW iX350 xDrive
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or BMW iX3 — who wins where
BMW iX3 leads 8 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX3 +126 km
- Battery kWhBMW iX3 +13.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX3 −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBMW iX3 +163 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX3 −1.7 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWBMW iX3 +130 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minBMW iX3 −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −85 kg
- Boot lBMW iX3 +9 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs BMW iX3
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | BMW iX3 50 xDrive | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 805 km | BMW +126 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 108.7 kWh | BMW +13.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 15.1 kWh/100 km | BMW −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 400 kW | BMW +130 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 21 min | BMW −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 26.8 km/min | BMW +5.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 469 PS | BMW +163 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 4.9 s | BMW −1.7 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 210 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2285 kg | Audi −85 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 520 l | BMW +9 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only BMW |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4782 mm | BMW +11 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1895 mm | Audi +44 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1635 mm | BMW +24 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2897 mm | BMW +4 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
BMW iX3
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
BMW iX3
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or BMW iX3?
The BMW iX3 goes further: 805 km WLTP against the 679 km of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 126 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the BMW iX3 differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The BMW iX3 has AWD and 469 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the BMW iX3 — its 108.7 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or BMW iX3?
The BMW iX3 is stronger: 469 PS against the 306 PS of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron. The gap is 163 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.