Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Geely EX5
Biggest differences: Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Geely EX5 217 PS · DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 175 kW, Geely EX5 135 kW · WLTP range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 573 km, Geely EX5 451 km.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.
Geely EX5
The Geely EX5 is a crossover in the C segment that offers two battery options, providing a range of up to 451 kilometers, and features front-wheel drive.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Geely EX5
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Geely EX5 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 5 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +122 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +8.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmGeely EX5 −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +69 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hNo data
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +40 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgGeely EX5 −255 kg
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +74 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Geely EX5
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron45 | Geely EX5 Ultra | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 451 km | Audi +122 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 68.39 kWh | Audi +8.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Geely −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 175 kW | 135 kW | Audi +40 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 28 min 10–80% | 20 min 30–80% | 8 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 11.3 km/min | Audi +3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 217 PS | Audi +69 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | — | — |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | — | — |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2070 kg | 1815 kg | Geely −255 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 461 l | Audi +74 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Geely |
| Length | 4588 mm | 4615 mm | Geely +27 mm |
| Width | 1865 mm | 1901 mm | Geely +36 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1670 mm | Geely +56 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2750 mm | Audi +14 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Geely EX5
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Geely EX5
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Geely EX5?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 451 km of the Geely EX5. That is a difference of 122 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Geely EX5 differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Geely EX5 has FWD and 217 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Geely EX5 — its 68.39 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron takes more: 535 l against 461 l in the Geely EX5. The difference is 74 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.