Geely EX5 vs Škoda Elroq
Škoda Elroq leads 5 to 2
Biggest differences: Power — Geely EX5 217 PS, Škoda Elroq 299 PS · WLTP range — Geely EX5 451 km, Škoda Elroq 576 km · DC charging — Geely EX5 135 kW, Škoda Elroq 165 kW.
Geely EX5
The Geely EX5 is a crossover in the C segment that offers two battery options, providing a range of up to 451 kilometers, and features front-wheel drive.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Profile against the market: Geely EX5 vs Škoda Elroq
- Geely EX5Ultra
Škoda Elroq85x
Geely EX5 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 5 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +125 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +8.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmGeely EX5 −0.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +82 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hNo data
- DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +30 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgGeely EX5 −317 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +9 l
Technical data: Geely EX5 vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Geely EX5 Ultra | Škoda Elroq 85x | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 451 km | 576 km | Škoda +125 km |
| Battery | 68.39 kWh | 77 kWh | Škoda +8.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.2 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Geely −0.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 135 kW | 165 kW | Škoda +30 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 20 min 30–80% | 29 min 10–80% | 9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11.3 km/min | 13.9 km/min | Škoda +2.6 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 217 PS | 299 PS | Škoda +82 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 6.2 s | — |
| Top speed | — | 180 km/h | — |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1815 kg | 2132 kg | Geely −317 kg |
| Boot | 461 l | 470 l | Škoda +9 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4615 mm | 4488 mm | Geely +127 mm |
| Width | 1901 mm | 1884 mm | Geely +17 mm |
| Height | 1670 mm | 1620 mm | Geely +50 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2750 mm | 2766 mm | Škoda +16 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Geely EX5
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Geely EX5
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Geely EX5 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 451 km of the Geely EX5. That is a difference of 125 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Geely EX5 and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Geely EX5 has FWD and 217 PS. The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS.
Which is more powerful — Geely EX5 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 299 PS against the 217 PS of the Geely EX5. The gap is 82 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Geely EX5 accepts up to 135 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 165 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.