Audi Q4 e-tron vs Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 3 to 0
Biggest differences: Boot — Audi Q4 e-tron 515 l, Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 527 l · WLTP range — Audi Q4 e-tron 563 km, Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 576 km · Consumption — Audi Q4 e-tron 13.7 kWh/100 km, Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 13.4 kWh/100 km.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 e-tron is a C-segment SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 440 to 563 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 e-tron vs Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 e-trone-tron performance- Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
Audi Q4 e-tron or Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 3 to 0
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +13 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +12 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 e-tron vs Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 e-tron e-tron performance | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 563 km | 576 km | Audi +13 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 77 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.7 kWh/100 km | 13.4 kWh/100 km | Audi −0.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 165 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | — | — |
| Voltage | — | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 286 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 6.6 s | No difference |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | — | — |
| Boot | 515 l | 527 l | Audi +12 l |
| Length | — | — | — |
| Width | — | — | — |
| Height | — | — | — |
| Wheelbase | — | — | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 e-tron or Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 563 km of the Audi Q4 e-tron. That is a difference of 13 km.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron up to 165 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron uses less electricity: 13.4 kWh/100 km against 13.7 kWh/100 km in the Audi Q4 e-tron. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 45 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.