Audi Q4 e-tron vs Škoda Elroq

Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q4 e-tron 175 kW, Škoda Elroq 135 kW · Boot — Audi Q4 e-tron 520 l, Škoda Elroq 470 l · Consumption — Audi Q4 e-tron 16 kWh/100 km, Škoda Elroq 15.2 kWh/100 km.

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron is an electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Audi Q4 e-tron vs Škoda Elroq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi Q4 e-tron or Škoda Elroq — who wins where

Škoda Elroq leads 4 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +17 km
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    556
    Škoda Elroq
    573
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    77
    Škoda Elroq
    77
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.8 kWh/100 km
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    16
    Škoda Elroq
    15.2
  • Power PSNo difference
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    286
    Škoda Elroq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sŠkoda Elroq −0.1 s
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    6.7
    Škoda Elroq
    6.6
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    180
    Škoda Elroq
    180
  • DC charging kWAudi Q4 e-tron +40 kW
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    175
    Škoda Elroq
    135
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    11
    Škoda Elroq
    11
  • Charging minNo difference
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    28
    Škoda Elroq
    28
  • Weight kgŠkoda Elroq −20 kg
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    2070
    Škoda Elroq
    2050
  • Boot lAudi Q4 e-tron +50 l
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    520
    Škoda Elroq
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi Q4 e-tron vs Škoda Elroq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi Q4 e-tron vs Škoda Elroq
Key parameters Audi Q4 e-tron
45
Škoda Elroq
85
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range556 km573 kmŠkoda +17 km
Battery77 kWh77 kWhNo difference
Consumption16 kWh/100 km15.2 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging175 kW135 kWAudi +40 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%28 min28 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging13.9 km/min14.3 km/minŠkoda +0.4 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS286 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h6.7 s6.6 sŠkoda −0.1 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2070 kg2050 kgŠkoda −20 kg
Boot520 l470 lAudi +50 l
Length4588 mm4488 mmAudi +100 mm
Width1865 mm1884 mmŠkoda +19 mm
Height1632 mm1625 mmAudi +7 mm
Wheelbase2764 mm2765 mmŠkoda +1 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi Q4 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.8
Monthly60
Yearly720

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi Q4 e-tron

Škoda Elroq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 e-tron or Škoda Elroq?

The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 556 km of the Audi Q4 e-tron. That is a difference of 17 km.

Which charges faster?

The Audi Q4 e-tron accepts up to 175 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 135 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 28 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Škoda Elroq uses less electricity: 15.2 kWh/100 km against 16 kWh/100 km in the Audi Q4 e-tron. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 120 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.