Audi A6 e-tron vs Volvo ES90
Audi A6 e-tron leads 6 to 4
Biggest differences: Power — Audi A6 e-tron 367 PS, Volvo ES90 680 PS · 0–100 km/h — Audi A6 e-tron 5.4 s, Volvo ES90 4 s · DC charging — Audi A6 e-tron 270 kW, Volvo ES90 350 kW.
Audi A6 e-tron
The Audi A6 e-tron is a sedan in the E segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges, with a top speed of up to 240 km/h.
Volvo ES90
The Volvo ES90 is an electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three powertrain variants with WLTP ranges of up to 702 km.
Profile against the market: Audi A6 e-tron vs Volvo ES90
Audi A6 e-tronperformance
Volvo ES90Twin Motor Performance
Audi A6 e-tron or Volvo ES90 — who wins where
Audi A6 e-tron leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi A6 e-tron +74 km
- Battery kWhVolvo ES90 +11.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A6 e-tron −3.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo ES90 +313 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo ES90 −1.4 s
- Top speed km/hAudi A6 e-tron +30 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo ES90 +80 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi A6 e-tron −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi A6 e-tron −360 kg
- Boot lAudi A6 e-tron +60 l
Technical data: Audi A6 e-tron vs Volvo ES90
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi A6 e-tron performance | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 776 km | 702 km | Audi +74 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 106 kWh | Volvo +11.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.6 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km | Audi −3.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 350 kW | Volvo +80 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 21 min | 22 min | Audi −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 25.9 km/min | 22.3 km/min | Audi +3.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 367 PS | 680 PS | Volvo +313 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.4 s | 4 s | Volvo −1.4 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Audi +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2175 kg | 2535 kg | Audi −360 kg |
| Boot | 502 l | 442 l | Audi +60 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volvo |
| Length | 4928 mm | 5000 mm | Volvo +72 mm |
| Width | 1923 mm | 1942 mm | Volvo +19 mm |
| Height | 1487 mm | 1549 mm | Volvo +62 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2946 mm | 3102 mm | Volvo +156 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi A6 e-tron
Volvo ES90
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi A6 e-tron
Volvo ES90
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi A6 e-tron or Volvo ES90?
The Audi A6 e-tron goes further: 776 km WLTP against the 702 km of the Volvo ES90. That is a difference of 74 km.
Why does the Volvo ES90 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Audi A6 e-tron?
The Volvo ES90 carries 106 kWh and covers 702 km, while the Audi A6 e-tron with its 94.9 kWh battery does 776 km. Energy use decides it: 16.7 against 13.6 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi A6 e-tron and the Volvo ES90 differ?
The Audi A6 e-tron has RWD and 367 PS. The Volvo ES90 has AWD and 680 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volvo ES90 — its 106 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi A6 e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.