Audi A6 e-tron vs Porsche Taycan
Biggest differences: Consumption — Audi A6 e-tron 13.6 kWh/100 km, Porsche Taycan 17.1 kWh/100 km · Boot — Audi A6 e-tron 502 l, Porsche Taycan 407 l · Power — Audi A6 e-tron 367 PS, Porsche Taycan 435 PS.
Audi A6 e-tron
The Audi A6 e-tron is a sedan in the E segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges, with a top speed of up to 240 km/h.
Porsche Taycan
Porsche Taycan is an electric sedan in the E segment, offering a wide range of high-performance configurations and fast DC charging.
Profile against the market: Audi A6 e-tron vs Porsche Taycan
Audi A6 e-tronperformance- Porsche TaycanPerformance Battery Plus
Audi A6 e-tron or Porsche Taycan — who wins where
Porsche Taycan leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi A6 e-tron +98 km
- Battery kWhPorsche Taycan +2.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A6 e-tron −3.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPorsche Taycan +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPorsche Taycan −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hPorsche Taycan +20 km/h
- DC charging kWPorsche Taycan +50 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minPorsche Taycan −3 min
- Weight ↓ kgPorsche Taycan −5 kg
- Boot lAudi A6 e-tron +95 l
Technical data: Audi A6 e-tron vs Porsche Taycan
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi A6 e-tronperformance | Porsche Taycan Performance Battery Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 776 km | 678 km | Audi +98 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 97 kWh | Porsche +2.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.6 kWh/100 km | 17.1 kWh/100 km | Audi −3.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 320 kW | Porsche +50 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 21 min | 18 min | Porsche −3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 25.9 km/min | 26.4 km/min | Porsche +0.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 367 PS | 435 PS | Porsche +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.4 s | 4.8 s | Porsche −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 230 km/h | Porsche +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2175 kg | 2170 kg | Porsche −5 kg |
| Boot | 502 l | 407 l | Audi +95 l |
| Length | 4928 mm | 4963 mm | Porsche +35 mm |
| Width | 1923 mm | 1966 mm | Porsche +43 mm |
| Height | 1487 mm | 1379 mm | Audi +108 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2946 mm | 2900 mm | Audi +46 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi A6 e-tron
Porsche Taycan
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi A6 e-tron
Porsche Taycan
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi A6 e-tron or Porsche Taycan?
The Audi A6 e-tron goes further: 776 km WLTP against the 678 km of the Porsche Taycan. That is a difference of 98 km.
Why does the Porsche Taycan have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Audi A6 e-tron?
The Porsche Taycan carries 97 kWh and covers 678 km, while the Audi A6 e-tron with its 94.9 kWh battery does 776 km. Energy use decides it: 17.1 against 13.6 kWh/100 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi A6 e-tron takes more: 502 l against 407 l in the Porsche Taycan. The difference is 95 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi A6 e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Porsche Taycan up to 320 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 21 and 18 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.




