Audi A2 e-tron vs MG 4 Urban

Audi A2 e-tron leads 7 to 2

Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi A2 e-tron 183 kW, MG 4 Urban 87 kW · WLTP range — Audi A2 e-tron 646 km, MG 4 Urban 416 km · Battery — Audi A2 e-tron 79 kWh, MG 4 Urban 52.8 kWh.

Audi A2 e-tron

The Audi A2 e-tron is an electric hatchback in the C segment, offered with four different powertrain configurations and a WLTP range of up to 646 km.

MG 4 Urban

MG 4 Urban is an electric C-segment hatchback, offering two powertrain variants with different battery capacities and power.

Profile against the market: Audi A2 e-tron vs MG 4 Urban

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi A2 e-tron or MG 4 Urban — who wins where

Audi A2 e-tron leads 7 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi A2 e-tron +230 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    646
    MG 4 Urban
    416
  • Battery kWhAudi A2 e-tron +26.2 kWh
    Audi A2 e-tron
    79
    MG 4 Urban
    52.8
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A2 e-tron −1.4 kWh/100 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    13.9
    MG 4 Urban
    15.3
  • Power PSAudi A2 e-tron +71 PS
    Audi A2 e-tron
    231
    MG 4 Urban
    160
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi A2 e-tron −2.5 s
    Audi A2 e-tron
    7
    MG 4 Urban
    9.5
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    160
    MG 4 Urban
    160
  • DC charging kWAudi A2 e-tron +96 kW
    Audi A2 e-tron
    183
    MG 4 Urban
    87
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    11
    MG 4 Urban
    11
  • Charging ↓ minAudi A2 e-tron −1 min
    Audi A2 e-tron
    29
    MG 4 Urban
    30
  • Weight ↓ kgMG 4 Urban −390 kg
    Audi A2 e-tron
    1910
    MG 4 Urban
    1520
  • Boot lMG 4 Urban +74 l
    Audi A2 e-tron
    396
    MG 4 Urban
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs MG 4 Urban

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs MG 4 Urban
Key parameters Audi A2 e-tron
170 kW
MG 4 Urban
Comfort Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range646 km416 kmAudi +230 km
Battery79 kWh52.8 kWhAudi +26.2 kWh
Consumption ↓13.9 kWh/100 km15.3 kWh/100 kmAudi −1.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW87 kWAudi +96 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓29 min30 minAudi −1 min
Range per minute of charging15.6 km/min9.7 km/minAudi +5.9 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS160 PSAudi +71 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7 s9.5 sAudi −2.5 s
Top speed160 km/h160 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓1910 kg1520 kgMG −390 kg
Boot396 l470 lMG +74 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length—4395 mm—
Width—1842 mm—
Height—1549 mm—
Wheelbase—2750 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi A2 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

MG 4 Urban

Cost per 100 km4.59
Monthly57
Yearly689

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi A2 e-tron

MG 4 Urban

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi A2 e-tron or MG 4 Urban?

The Audi A2 e-tron goes further: 646 km WLTP against the 416 km of the MG 4 Urban. That is a difference of 230 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Audi A2 e-tron and the MG 4 Urban differ?

The Audi A2 e-tron has RWD and 231 PS. The MG 4 Urban has FWD and 160 PS.

Which is more powerful — Audi A2 e-tron or MG 4 Urban?

The Audi A2 e-tron is stronger: 231 PS against the 160 PS of the MG 4 Urban. The gap is 71 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The MG 4 Urban takes more: 470 l against 396 l in the Audi A2 e-tron. The difference is 74 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.