Alpine A290 vs Hyundai IONIQ 3

Biggest differences: Boot — Alpine A290 326 l, Hyundai IONIQ 3 441 l · Power — Alpine A290 180 PS, Hyundai IONIQ 3 135 PS · WLTP range — Alpine A290 380 km, Hyundai IONIQ 3 497 km.

Alpine A290

This electric hatchback in the B-segment offers two power options, both with the same WLTP range of 380 kilometers.

Hyundai IONIQ 3

The Hyundai IONIQ 3 is an all-electric hatchback in the B-segment, available with two front-wheel drive variants offering different battery configurations and power outputs.

Profile against the market: Alpine A290 vs Hyundai IONIQ 3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Alpine A290 or Hyundai IONIQ 3 — who wins where

Hyundai IONIQ 3 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmHyundai IONIQ 3 +117 km
    Alpine A290
    380
    Hyundai IONIQ 3
    497
  • Battery kWhHyundai IONIQ 3 +9 kWh
    Alpine A290
    52
    Hyundai IONIQ 3
    61
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmHyundai IONIQ 3 −2 kWh/100 km
    Alpine A290
    15.8
    Hyundai IONIQ 3
    13.8
  • Power PSAlpine A290 +45 PS
    Alpine A290
    180
    Hyundai IONIQ 3
    135
  • 0–100 km/h sAlpine A290 −2.2 s
    Alpine A290
    7.4
    Hyundai IONIQ 3
    9.6
  • Top speed km/hHyundai IONIQ 3 +5 km/h
    Alpine A290
    160
    Hyundai IONIQ 3
    165
  • DC charging kWHyundai IONIQ 3 +15 kW
    Alpine A290
    100
    Hyundai IONIQ 3
    115
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Alpine A290
    11
    Hyundai IONIQ 3
    11
  • Weight kgAlpine A290 −72 kg
    Alpine A290
    1483
    Hyundai IONIQ 3
    1555
  • Boot lHyundai IONIQ 3 +115 l
    Alpine A290
    326
    Hyundai IONIQ 3
    441

Add a third car

Technical data: Alpine A290 vs Hyundai IONIQ 3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Alpine A290 vs Hyundai IONIQ 3
Key parameters Alpine A290
GT
Hyundai IONIQ 3
Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range380 km497 kmHyundai +117 km
Battery52 kWh61 kWhHyundai +9 kWh
Consumption15.8 kWh/100 km13.8 kWh/100 kmHyundai −2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW115 kWHyundai +15 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 30 min 15–80%30 min 10–80%No difference
Range per minute of charging8.2 km/min11.6 km/minHyundai +3.4 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power180 PS135 PSAlpine +45 PS
0–100 km/h7.4 s9.6 sAlpine −2.2 s
Top speed160 km/h165 km/hHyundai +5 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1483 kg1555 kgAlpine −72 kg
Boot326 l441 lHyundai +115 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length3997 mm4155 mmHyundai +158 mm
Width1823 mm1800 mmAlpine +23 mm
Height1512 mm1505 mmAlpine +7 mm
Wheelbase2534 mm2680 mmHyundai +146 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Alpine A290

Cost per 100 km4.74
Monthly59
Yearly711

Hyundai IONIQ 3

Cost per 100 km4.14
Monthly52
Yearly621

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Alpine A290

Hyundai IONIQ 3

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Alpine A290 or Hyundai IONIQ 3?

The Hyundai IONIQ 3 goes further: 497 km WLTP against the 380 km of the Alpine A290. That is a difference of 117 km.

Which is more powerful — Alpine A290 or Hyundai IONIQ 3?

The Alpine A290 is stronger: 180 PS against the 135 PS of the Hyundai IONIQ 3. The gap is 45 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Hyundai IONIQ 3 takes more: 441 l against 326 l in the Alpine A290. The difference is 115 l.

Which charges faster?

The Alpine A290 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Hyundai IONIQ 3 up to 115 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.