Hyundai IONIQ 3 vs Peugeot e-208
Biggest differences: Boot — Hyundai IONIQ 3 441 l, Peugeot e-208 265 l · Battery — Hyundai IONIQ 3 61 kWh, Peugeot e-208 51 kWh · 0–100 km/h — Hyundai IONIQ 3 9.6 s, Peugeot e-208 8.2 s.
Hyundai IONIQ 3
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 is an all-electric hatchback in the B-segment, available with two front-wheel drive variants offering different battery configurations and power outputs.
Peugeot e-208
The Peugeot e-208 is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with three different powertrain options, each offering varying power outputs and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Hyundai IONIQ 3 vs Peugeot e-208
Hyundai IONIQ 3Long Range
Peugeot e-208GT 156
Hyundai IONIQ 3 or Peugeot e-208 — who wins where
Hyundai IONIQ 3 leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmHyundai IONIQ 3 +64 km
- Battery kWhHyundai IONIQ 3 +10 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmHyundai IONIQ 3 −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot e-208 +21 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPeugeot e-208 −1.4 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai IONIQ 3 +15 km/h
- DC charging kWHyundai IONIQ 3 +15 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot e-208 −100 kg
- Boot lHyundai IONIQ 3 +176 l
Technical data: Hyundai IONIQ 3 vs Peugeot e-208
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Hyundai IONIQ 3 Long Range | Peugeot e-208 GT 156 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 497 km | 433 km | Hyundai +64 km |
| Battery | 61 kWh | 51 kWh | Hyundai +10 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.8 kWh/100 km | 14.9 kWh/100 km | Hyundai −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 115 kW | 100 kW | Hyundai +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 10–80% | 35 min 0–80% | 5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11.6 km/min | 9.9 km/min | Hyundai +1.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 135 PS | 156 PS | Peugeot +21 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9.6 s | 8.2 s | Peugeot −1.4 s |
| Top speed | 165 km/h | 150 km/h | Hyundai +15 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1555 kg | 1455 kg | Peugeot −100 kg |
| Boot | 441 l | 265 l | Hyundai +176 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4155 mm | 4055 mm | Hyundai +100 mm |
| Width | 1800 mm | 1745 mm | Hyundai +55 mm |
| Height | 1505 mm | 1430 mm | Hyundai +75 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2680 mm | 2540 mm | Hyundai +140 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Hyundai IONIQ 3
Peugeot e-208
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Hyundai IONIQ 3
Peugeot e-208
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Hyundai IONIQ 3 or Peugeot e-208?
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 goes further: 497 km WLTP against the 433 km of the Peugeot e-208. That is a difference of 64 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 takes more: 441 l against 265 l in the Peugeot e-208. The difference is 176 l.
Which charges faster?
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 accepts up to 115 kW DC, the Peugeot e-208 up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 uses less electricity: 13.8 kWh/100 km against 14.9 kWh/100 km in the Peugeot e-208. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 165 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.