Alpine A290 vs GWM Ora 03

Alpine A290 leads 7 to 2

Biggest differences: Charging 15–80% — Alpine A290 30 min, GWM Ora 03 48 min · DC charging — Alpine A290 100 kW, GWM Ora 03 67 kW · Boot — Alpine A290 326 l, GWM Ora 03 228 l.

Alpine A290

Alpine A290 is an electric B-segment hatchback offering two drivetrain variants with power from 180 hp to 220 hp.

GWM Ora 03

The GWM Ora 03 is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery capacity options while maintaining the same power output for the powertrain.

Profile against the market: Alpine A290 vs GWM Ora 03

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Alpine A290 or GWM Ora 03 — who wins where

Alpine A290 leads 7 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmGWM Ora 03 +40 km
    Alpine A290
    380
    GWM Ora 03
    420
  • Battery kWhGWM Ora 03 +11 kWh
    Alpine A290
    52
    GWM Ora 03
    63
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAlpine A290 −0.7 kWh/100 km
    Alpine A290
    15.8
    GWM Ora 03
    16.5
  • Power PSAlpine A290 +9 PS
    Alpine A290
    180
    GWM Ora 03
    171
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAlpine A290 −0.8 s
    Alpine A290
    7.4
    GWM Ora 03
    8.2
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Alpine A290
    160
    GWM Ora 03
    160
  • DC charging kWAlpine A290 +33 kW
    Alpine A290
    100
    GWM Ora 03
    67
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Alpine A290
    11
    GWM Ora 03
    11
  • Charging ↓ minAlpine A290 −18 min
    Alpine A290
    30
    GWM Ora 03
    48
  • Weight ↓ kgAlpine A290 −97 kg
    Alpine A290
    1483
    GWM Ora 03
    1580
  • Boot lAlpine A290 +98 l
    Alpine A290
    326
    GWM Ora 03
    228

Add a third car

Technical data: Alpine A290 vs GWM Ora 03

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Alpine A290 vs GWM Ora 03
Key parameters Alpine A290
GT
GWM Ora 03
63 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range380 km420 kmGWM Ora +40 km
Battery52 kWh63 kWhGWM Ora +11 kWh
Consumption ↓15.8 kWh/100 km16.5 kWh/100 kmAlpine −0.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW67 kWAlpine +33 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 15–80% ↓30 min48 minAlpine −18 min
Range per minute of charging8.2 km/min5.7 km/minAlpine +2.5 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power180 PS171 PSAlpine +9 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.4 s8.2 sAlpine −0.8 s
Top speed160 km/h160 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1483 kg1580 kgAlpine −97 kg
Boot326 l228 lAlpine +98 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length3997 mm4235 mmGWM Ora +238 mm
Width1823 mm1825 mmGWM Ora +2 mm
Height1512 mm1603 mmGWM Ora +91 mm
Wheelbase2534 mm2650 mmGWM Ora +116 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Alpine A290

Cost per 100 km4.74
Monthly59
Yearly711

GWM Ora 03

Cost per 100 km4.95
Monthly62
Yearly743

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Alpine A290

GWM Ora 03

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Alpine A290 or GWM Ora 03?

The GWM Ora 03 goes further: 420 km WLTP against the 380 km of the Alpine A290. That is a difference of 40 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Alpine A290 takes more: 326 l against 228 l in the GWM Ora 03. The difference is 98 l.

Which charges faster?

The Alpine A290 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the GWM Ora 03 up to 67 kW. Charging from 15 to 80% takes 30 and 48 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Alpine A290 uses less electricity: 15.8 kWh/100 km against 16.5 kWh/100 km in the GWM Ora 03. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 105 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.