GWM Ora 03 vs Nio Firefly
Biggest differences: Boot — GWM Ora 03 228 l, Nio Firefly 404 l · Battery — GWM Ora 03 63 kWh, Nio Firefly 42.1 kWh · DC charging — GWM Ora 03 67 kW, Nio Firefly 100 kW.
GWM Ora 03
The GWM Ora 03 is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery capacity options while maintaining the same power output for the powertrain.
Nio Firefly
The Nio Firefly is a compact hatchback with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 330 km in the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: GWM Ora 03 vs Nio Firefly
GWM Ora 0363 kWh
Nio Firefly42.1 kWh RWD
GWM Ora 03 or Nio Firefly — who wins where
Nio Firefly leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmGWM Ora 03 +90 km
- Battery kWhGWM Ora 03 +20.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNio Firefly −2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSGWM Ora 03 +28 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio Firefly −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hGWM Ora 03 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWNio Firefly +33 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNio Firefly −113 kg
- Boot lNio Firefly +176 l
Technical data: GWM Ora 03 vs Nio Firefly
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | GWM Ora 03 63 kWh | Nio Firefly 42.1 kWh RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 420 km | 330 km | GWM Ora +90 km |
| Battery | 63 kWh | 42.1 kWh | GWM Ora +20.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.5 kWh/100 km | 14.5 kWh/100 km | Nio −2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 67 kW | 100 kW | Nio +33 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 48 min 15–80% | 29 min 10–80% | 19 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 5.7 km/min | 8 km/min | Nio +2.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 171 PS | 143 PS | GWM Ora +28 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.2 s | 8.1 s | Nio −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 150 km/h | GWM Ora +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1580 kg | 1467 kg | Nio −113 kg |
| Boot | 228 l | 404 l | Nio +176 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4235 mm | 4003 mm | GWM Ora +232 mm |
| Width | 1825 mm | 1885 mm | Nio +60 mm |
| Height | 1603 mm | 1557 mm | GWM Ora +46 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2650 mm | 2615 mm | GWM Ora +35 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
GWM Ora 03
Nio Firefly
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
GWM Ora 03
Nio Firefly
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — GWM Ora 03 or Nio Firefly?
The GWM Ora 03 goes further: 420 km WLTP against the 330 km of the Nio Firefly. That is a difference of 90 km.
How do the drivetrains of the GWM Ora 03 and the Nio Firefly differ?
The GWM Ora 03 has FWD and 171 PS. The Nio Firefly has RWD and 143 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Nio Firefly takes more: 404 l against 228 l in the GWM Ora 03. The difference is 176 l.
Which charges faster?
The GWM Ora 03 accepts up to 67 kW DC, the Nio Firefly up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.