Alpine A290 vs Fiat Grande Panda
Alpine A290 leads 7 to 1
Biggest differences: Power — Alpine A290 180 PS, Fiat Grande Panda 113 PS · 0–100 km/h — Alpine A290 7.4 s, Fiat Grande Panda 11.5 s · Top speed — Alpine A290 160 km/h, Fiat Grande Panda 132 km/h.
Alpine A290
Alpine A290 is an electric B-segment hatchback offering two drivetrain variants with power from 180 hp to 220 hp.
Fiat Grande Panda
The Fiat Grande Panda is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offering a range of 320 km according to the WLTP cycle and front-wheel drive.
Profile against the market: Alpine A290 vs Fiat Grande Panda
Alpine A290GT
Fiat Grande PandaLa Prima
Alpine A290 or Fiat Grande Panda — who wins where
Alpine A290 leads 7 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAlpine A290 +60 km
- Battery kWhAlpine A290 +8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAlpine A290 −1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAlpine A290 +67 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAlpine A290 −4.1 s
- Top speed km/hAlpine A290 +28 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgAlpine A290 −74 kg
- Boot lFiat Grande Panda +35 l
Technical data: Alpine A290 vs Fiat Grande Panda
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Alpine A290 GT | Fiat Grande Panda La Prima | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 380 km | 320 km | Alpine +60 km |
| Battery | 52 kWh | 44 kWh | Alpine +8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.8 kWh/100 km | 16.8 kWh/100 km | Alpine −1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 15–80% | 27 min 20–80% | 3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.2 km/min | 7.1 km/min | Alpine +1.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 180 PS | 113 PS | Alpine +67 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.4 s | 11.5 s | Alpine −4.1 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 132 km/h | Alpine +28 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1483 kg | 1557 kg | Alpine −74 kg |
| Boot | 326 l | 361 l | Fiat +35 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 3997 mm | 3999 mm | Fiat +2 mm |
| Width | 1823 mm | 1763 mm | Alpine +60 mm |
| Height | 1512 mm | 1576 mm | Fiat +64 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2534 mm | 2540 mm | Fiat +6 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Alpine A290
Fiat Grande Panda
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Alpine A290
Fiat Grande Panda
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Alpine A290vsJAC E30XAlpine A290vs
Mini Cooper ElectricAlpine A290vs
Renault 5 E-TechAlpine A290vs
Peugeot e-208Alpine A290vs
Volkswagen ID. PoloAlpine A290vs
Nio FireflyFiat Grande Pandavs
Citroën ë-C3Fiat Grande Pandavs
BYD Dolphin SurfFiat Grande PandavsPeugeot e-208Fiat Grande PandavsVolkswagen ID. PoloFiat Grande PandavsNio FireflyFrequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Alpine A290 or Fiat Grande Panda?
The Alpine A290 goes further: 380 km WLTP against the 320 km of the Fiat Grande Panda. That is a difference of 60 km.
Which is more powerful — Alpine A290 or Fiat Grande Panda?
The Alpine A290 is stronger: 180 PS against the 113 PS of the Fiat Grande Panda. The gap is 67 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Alpine A290 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Fiat Grande Panda up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Alpine A290 uses less electricity: 15.8 kWh/100 km against 16.8 kWh/100 km in the Fiat Grande Panda. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 150 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.