Fiat Grande Panda vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Biggest differences: Power — Fiat Grande Panda 113 PS, Volkswagen ID. Polo 211 PS · 0–100 km/h — Fiat Grande Panda 11.5 s, Volkswagen ID. Polo 7.4 s · WLTP range — Fiat Grande Panda 320 km, Volkswagen ID. Polo 454 km.
Fiat Grande Panda
The Fiat Grande Panda is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offering a range of 320 km according to the WLTP cycle and front-wheel drive.
Volkswagen ID. Polo
The Volkswagen ID. Polo is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offered with three powertrain configurations featuring different ranges and performance levels.
Profile against the market: Fiat Grande Panda vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Fiat Grande PandaLa Prima
Volkswagen ID. Polo52 kWh 155 kW
Fiat Grande Panda or Volkswagen ID. Polo — who wins where
Volkswagen ID. Polo leads 8 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolkswagen ID. Polo +134 km
- Battery kWhVolkswagen ID. Polo +8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolkswagen ID. Polo −3.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolkswagen ID. Polo +98 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolkswagen ID. Polo −4.1 s
- Top speed km/hVolkswagen ID. Polo +28 km/h
- DC charging kWVolkswagen ID. Polo +5 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgFiat Grande Panda −19 kg
- Boot lVolkswagen ID. Polo +80 l
Technical data: Fiat Grande Panda vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Fiat Grande Panda La Prima | Volkswagen ID. Polo 52 kWh 155 kW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 320 km | 454 km | Volkswagen +134 km |
| Battery | 44 kWh | 52 kWh | Volkswagen +8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.8 kWh/100 km | 13.3 kWh/100 km | Volkswagen −3.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 105 kW | Volkswagen +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 24 min 10–80% | 3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 7.1 km/min | 13.2 km/min | Volkswagen +6.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 113 PS | 211 PS | Volkswagen +98 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 11.5 s | 7.4 s | Volkswagen −4.1 s |
| Top speed | 132 km/h | 160 km/h | Volkswagen +28 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1557 kg | 1576 kg | Fiat −19 kg |
| Boot | 361 l | 441 l | Volkswagen +80 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 3999 mm | 4053 mm | Volkswagen +54 mm |
| Width | 1763 mm | 1816 mm | Volkswagen +53 mm |
| Height | 1576 mm | 1530 mm | Fiat +46 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2540 mm | 2600 mm | Volkswagen +60 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Fiat Grande Panda
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Fiat Grande Panda
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Fiat Grande Panda or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo goes further: 454 km WLTP against the 320 km of the Fiat Grande Panda. That is a difference of 134 km.
Which is more powerful — Fiat Grande Panda or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo is stronger: 211 PS against the 113 PS of the Fiat Grande Panda. The gap is 98 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo takes more: 441 l against 361 l in the Fiat Grande Panda. The difference is 80 l.
Which charges faster?
The Fiat Grande Panda accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Volkswagen ID. Polo up to 105 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.