Abarth 600e vs Jaecoo 5 EV

Jaecoo 5 EV leads 5 to 4

Biggest differences: Boot — Abarth 600e 360 l, Jaecoo 5 EV 480 l · DC charging — Abarth 600e 100 kW, Jaecoo 5 EV 130 kW · Consumption — Abarth 600e 18 kWh/100 km, Jaecoo 5 EV 13.9 kWh/100 km.

Abarth 600e

The Abarth 600e is a compact electric crossover with front-wheel drive, offering two power options and a WLTP range of 334 kilometers.

Jaecoo 5 EV

Jaecoo 5 EV is a B-segment SUV with front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 402 km.

Profile against the market: Abarth 600e vs Jaecoo 5 EV

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Abarth 600e or Jaecoo 5 EV — who wins where

Jaecoo 5 EV leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmJaecoo 5 EV +68 km
    Abarth 600e
    334
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    402
  • Battery kWhJaecoo 5 EV +10 kWh
    Abarth 600e
    51
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    61
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmJaecoo 5 EV −4.1 kWh/100 km
    Abarth 600e
    18
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    13.9
  • Power PSAbarth 600e +29 PS
    Abarth 600e
    240
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    211
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAbarth 600e −1.5 s
    Abarth 600e
    6.24
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    7.7
  • Top speed km/hAbarth 600e +25 km/h
    Abarth 600e
    200
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    175
  • DC charging kWJaecoo 5 EV +30 kW
    Abarth 600e
    100
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    130
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Abarth 600e
    11
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgAbarth 600e −161 kg
    Abarth 600e
    1624
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    1785
  • Boot lJaecoo 5 EV +120 l
    Abarth 600e
    360
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    480

Add a third car

Technical data: Abarth 600e vs Jaecoo 5 EV

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Abarth 600e vs Jaecoo 5 EV
Key parameters Abarth 600e
Turismo
Jaecoo 5 EV
Electric
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range334 km402 kmJaecoo +68 km
Battery51 kWh61 kWhJaecoo +10 kWh
Consumption ↓18 kWh/100 km13.9 kWh/100 kmJaecoo −4.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW130 kWJaecoo +30 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠27 min 20–80%34 min 10–80%7 min
Range per minute of charging7.4 km/min8.3 km/minJaecoo +0.9 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power240 PS211 PSAbarth +29 PS
0–100 km/h ↓6.24 s7.7 sAbarth −1.5 s
Top speed200 km/h175 km/hAbarth +25 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1624 kg1785 kgAbarth −161 kg
Boot360 l480 lJaecoo +120 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Jaecoo
Length4189 mm4380 mmJaecoo +191 mm
Width1808 mm1860 mmJaecoo +52 mm
Height1505 mm1650 mmJaecoo +145 mm
Wheelbase2560 mm2620 mmJaecoo +60 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Abarth 600e

Cost per 100 km5.4
Monthly67
Yearly810

Jaecoo 5 EV

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Abarth 600e

Jaecoo 5 EV

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Abarth 600e or Jaecoo 5 EV?

The Jaecoo 5 EV goes further: 402 km WLTP against the 334 km of the Abarth 600e. That is a difference of 68 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Jaecoo 5 EV — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Abarth 600e, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Jaecoo 5 EV takes more: 480 l against 360 l in the Abarth 600e. The difference is 120 l.

Which charges faster?

The Abarth 600e accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Jaecoo 5 EV up to 130 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.