Abarth 500e vs Smart #2

Abarth 500e leads 5 to 4

Biggest differences: Power — Abarth 500e 155 PS, Smart #2 82 PS · 0–100 km/h — Abarth 500e 7 s, Smart #2 11.6 s · Boot — Abarth 500e 185 l, Smart #2 305 l.

Abarth 500e

This is an electric hatchback in the A-segment, combining compact dimensions with a top speed of up to 155 km/h and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7 seconds.

Smart #2

The Smart #2 is a two-seater city car in the A segment: it features a 35.8 kWh battery, a WLTP range of 290 km, a power output of 82 horsepower, and DC fast charging up to 65 kW.

Profile against the market: Abarth 500e vs Smart #2

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Abarth 500e or Smart #2 — who wins where

Abarth 500e leads 5 to 4

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmSmart #2 +37 km
    Abarth 500e
    253
    Smart #2
    290
  • Battery kWhAbarth 500e +2 kWh
    Abarth 500e
    37.8
    Smart #2
    35.8
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSmart #2 −4.5 kWh/100 km
    Abarth 500e
    18.1
    Smart #2
    13.6
  • Power PSAbarth 500e +73 PS
    Abarth 500e
    155
    Smart #2
    82
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAbarth 500e −4.6 s
    Abarth 500e
    7
    Smart #2
    11.6
  • Top speed km/hAbarth 500e +15 km/h
    Abarth 500e
    155
    Smart #2
    140
  • DC charging kWAbarth 500e +20 kW
    Abarth 500e
    85
    Smart #2
    65
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Abarth 500e
    11
    Smart #2
    11
  • Charging ↓ minNo data
    Abarth 500e
    35
    Smart #2
    —
  • Weight ↓ kgSmart #2 −270 kg
    Abarth 500e
    1410
    Smart #2
    1140
  • Boot lSmart #2 +120 l
    Abarth 500e
    185
    Smart #2
    305

Add a third car

Technical data: Abarth 500e vs Smart #2

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Abarth 500e vs Smart #2
Key parameters Abarth 500e
Turismo
Smart #2
Pure+
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range253 km290 kmSmart +37 km
Battery37.8 kWh35.8 kWhAbarth +2 kWh
Consumption ↓18.1 kWh/100 km13.6 kWh/100 kmSmart −4.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging85 kW65 kWAbarth +20 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 0–80% ↓35 min——
Range per minute of charging5.8 km/min——
Voltage400 V——
Performance and drivetrain
Power155 PS82 PSAbarth +73 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7 s11.6 sAbarth −4.6 s
Top speed155 km/h140 km/hAbarth +15 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓1410 kg1140 kgSmart −270 kg
Boot185 l305 lSmart +120 l
Length3673 mm2746 mmAbarth +927 mm
Width1683 mm1760 mmSmart +77 mm
Height1518 mm1555 mmSmart +37 mm
Wheelbase2322 mm1875 mmAbarth +447 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Abarth 500e

Cost per 100 km5.43
Monthly68
Yearly815

Smart #2

Cost per 100 km4.08
Monthly51
Yearly612

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Abarth 500e

Smart #2

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment A

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Abarth 500e or Smart #2?

The Smart #2 goes further: 290 km WLTP against the 253 km of the Abarth 500e. That is a difference of 37 km.

Why does the Abarth 500e have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Smart #2?

The Abarth 500e carries 37.8 kWh and covers 253 km, while the Smart #2 with its 35.8 kWh battery does 290 km. Energy use decides it: 18.1 against 13.6 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Abarth 500e and the Smart #2 differ?

The Abarth 500e has FWD and 155 PS. The Smart #2 has RWD and 82 PS.

Which is more powerful — Abarth 500e or Smart #2?

The Abarth 500e is stronger: 155 PS against the 82 PS of the Smart #2. The gap is 73 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.