Mini Countryman Electric vs Škoda Elroq
Biggest differences: Power — Mini Countryman Electric 204 PS, Škoda Elroq 286 PS · 0–100 km/h — Mini Countryman Electric 8.6 s, Škoda Elroq 6.6 s · Battery — Mini Countryman Electric 65.2 kWh, Škoda Elroq 77 kWh.
Mini Countryman Electric
The Mini Countryman Electric is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering two versions with electric power and a powerful motor.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Mini Countryman Electric vs Škoda Elroq
Mini Countryman Electric or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +73 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +11.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMini Countryman Electric −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +82 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −2 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +10 km/h
- DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +5 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minŠkoda Elroq −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgMini Countryman Electric −185 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +10 l
Technical data: Mini Countryman Electric vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Mini Countryman ElectricE |  Škoda Elroq85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 500 km | 573 km | Škoda +73 km |
| Battery | 65.2 kWh | 77 kWh | Škoda +11.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.7 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Mini −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 130 kW | 135 kW | Škoda +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 28 min | Škoda −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.1 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Škoda +2.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +82 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.6 s | 6.6 s | Škoda −2 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1865 kg | 2050 kg | Mini −185 kg |
| Boot | 460 l | 470 l | Škoda +10 l |
| Length | 4433 mm | 4488 mm | Škoda +55 mm |
| Width | 1843 mm | 1884 mm | Škoda +41 mm |
| Height | 1656 mm | 1625 mm | Mini +31 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm | 2765 mm | Škoda +73 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mini Countryman Electric
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mini Countryman Electric
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mini Countryman Electric or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 500 km of the Mini Countryman Electric. That is a difference of 73 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Mini Countryman Electric and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Mini Countryman Electric has FWD and 204 PS. The Škoda Elroq has RWD and 286 PS.
Which is more powerful — Mini Countryman Electric or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 286 PS against the 204 PS of the Mini Countryman Electric. The gap is 82 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Mini Countryman Electric accepts up to 130 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 135 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.