Mazda CX-6e vs Voyah Courage

Voyah Courage leads 6 to 3

Biggest differences: Boot — Mazda CX-6e 363 l, Voyah Courage 527 l · Charging 10–80% — Mazda CX-6e 24 min, Voyah Courage 32 min · 0–100 km/h — Mazda CX-6e 7.9 s, Voyah Courage 6.8 s.

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e is a D-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 484 km in the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging capabilities.

Voyah Courage

The Voyah Courage is an SUV in the D-segment, offering all-wheel drive or rear-wheel drive options, with a WLTP range of up to 476 kilometers.

Profile against the market: Mazda CX-6e vs Voyah Courage

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Mazda CX-6e or Voyah Courage — who wins where

Voyah Courage leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMazda CX-6e +8 km
    Mazda CX-6e
    484
    Voyah Courage
    476
  • Battery kWhVoyah Courage +2 kWh
    Mazda CX-6e
    78
    Voyah Courage
    80
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNo difference
    Mazda CX-6e
    18.9
    Voyah Courage
    18.9
  • Power PSVoyah Courage +34 PS
    Mazda CX-6e
    258
    Voyah Courage
    292
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sVoyah Courage −1.1 s
    Mazda CX-6e
    7.9
    Voyah Courage
    6.8
  • Top speed km/hVoyah Courage +15 km/h
    Mazda CX-6e
    185
    Voyah Courage
    200
  • DC charging kWVoyah Courage +5 kW
    Mazda CX-6e
    195
    Voyah Courage
    200
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Mazda CX-6e
    11
    Voyah Courage
    11
  • Charging ↓ minMazda CX-6e −8 min
    Mazda CX-6e
    24
    Voyah Courage
    32
  • Weight ↓ kgMazda CX-6e −13 kg
    Mazda CX-6e
    2130
    Voyah Courage
    2143
  • Boot lVoyah Courage +164 l
    Mazda CX-6e
    363
    Voyah Courage
    527

Add a third car

Technical data: Mazda CX-6e vs Voyah Courage

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Mazda CX-6e vs Voyah Courage
Key parameters Mazda CX-6e
Takumi
Voyah Courage
RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range484 km476 kmMazda +8 km
Battery78 kWh80 kWhVoyah +2 kWh
Consumption ↓18.9 kWh/100 km18.9 kWh/100 kmNo difference
Charging
DC charging195 kW200 kWVoyah +5 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓24 min32 minMazda −8 min
Range per minute of charging14.1 km/min10.4 km/minMazda +3.7 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power258 PS292 PSVoyah +34 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.9 s6.8 sVoyah −1.1 s
Top speed185 km/h200 km/hVoyah +15 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2130 kg2143 kgMazda −13 kg
Boot363 l527 lVoyah +164 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4850 mm4725 mmMazda +125 mm
Width1935 mm1900 mmMazda +35 mm
Height1620 mm1650 mmVoyah +30 mm
Wheelbase2902 mm2900 mmMazda +2 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Mazda CX-6e

Cost per 100 km5.67
Monthly71
Yearly850

Voyah Courage

Cost per 100 km5.67
Monthly71
Yearly850

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Mazda CX-6e

Voyah Courage

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the Voyah Courage have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mazda CX-6e?

The Voyah Courage carries 80 kWh and covers 476 km, while the Mazda CX-6e with its 78 kWh battery does 484 km. Energy use decides it: 18.9 against 18.9 kWh/100 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Voyah Courage takes more: 527 l against 363 l in the Mazda CX-6e. The difference is 164 l.

Which charges faster?

The Mazda CX-6e accepts up to 195 kW DC, the Voyah Courage up to 200 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 24 and 32 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.