Lexus ES vs Volvo ES90

Biggest differences: Power — Lexus ES 224 PS, Volvo ES90 680 PS · DC charging — Lexus ES 150 kW, Volvo ES90 350 kW · 0–100 km/h — Lexus ES 8 s, Volvo ES90 4 s.

Lexus ES

The Lexus ES is a sedan in the E segment that offers two drivetrain options: front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive, with power ranging from 224 to 343 horsepower.

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 is an electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three powertrain variants with WLTP ranges of up to 702 km.

Profile against the market: Lexus ES vs Volvo ES90

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lexus ES or Volvo ES90 — who wins where

Volvo ES90 leads 7 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo ES90 +121 km
    Lexus ES
    581
    Volvo ES90
    702
  • Battery kWhVolvo ES90 +34 kWh
    Lexus ES
    72
    Volvo ES90
    106
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmLexus ES −0.5 kWh/100 km
    Lexus ES
    16.2
    Volvo ES90
    16.7
  • Power PSVolvo ES90 +456 PS
    Lexus ES
    224
    Volvo ES90
    680
  • 0–100 km/h sVolvo ES90 −4 s
    Lexus ES
    8
    Volvo ES90
    4
  • Top speed km/hVolvo ES90 +20 km/h
    Lexus ES
    160
    Volvo ES90
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo ES90 +200 kW
    Lexus ES
    150
    Volvo ES90
    350
  • AC charging kWLexus ES +11 kW
    Lexus ES
    22
    Volvo ES90
    11
  • Charging minVolvo ES90 −8 min
    Lexus ES
    30
    Volvo ES90
    22
  • Weight kgLexus ES −430 kg
    Lexus ES
    2105
    Volvo ES90
    2535
  • Boot lLexus ES +75 l
    Lexus ES
    517
    Volvo ES90
    442

Add a third car

Technical data: Lexus ES vs Volvo ES90

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lexus ES vs Volvo ES90
Key parameters Lexus ES
350e
Volvo ES90
Twin Motor Performance
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range581 km702 kmVolvo +121 km
Battery72 kWh106 kWhVolvo +34 kWh
Consumption16.2 kWh/100 km16.7 kWh/100 kmLexus −0.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW350 kWVolvo +200 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWLexus +11 kW
Charging 10–80%30 min22 minVolvo −8 min
Range per minute of charging13.6 km/min22.3 km/minVolvo +8.7 km/min
Voltage800 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power224 PS680 PSVolvo +456 PS
0–100 km/h8 s4 sVolvo −4 s
Top speed160 km/h180 km/hVolvo +20 km/h
DrivetrainFWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2105 kg2535 kgLexus −430 kg
Boot517 l442 lLexus +75 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Volvo
Length5140 mm5000 mmLexus +140 mm
Width1920 mm1942 mmVolvo +22 mm
Height1555 mm1549 mmLexus +6 mm
Wheelbase2950 mm3102 mmVolvo +152 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lexus ES

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Volvo ES90

Cost per 100 km5.01
Monthly63
Yearly752

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lexus ES

Volvo ES90

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Lexus ES or Volvo ES90?

The Volvo ES90 goes further: 702 km WLTP against the 581 km of the Lexus ES. That is a difference of 121 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Lexus ES and the Volvo ES90 differ?

The Lexus ES has FWD and 224 PS. The Volvo ES90 has AWD and 680 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Volvo ES90 — its 106 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Lexus ES, with 72 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Lexus ES or Volvo ES90?

The Volvo ES90 is stronger: 680 PS against the 224 PS of the Lexus ES. The gap is 456 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.