Kia EV2 vs Mini Aceman

Biggest differences: Power — Kia EV2 135 PS, Mini Aceman 218 PS · 0–100 km/h — Kia EV2 9.5 s, Mini Aceman 7.1 s · DC charging — Kia EV2 118 kW, Mini Aceman 95 kW.

Kia EV2

The Kia EV2 is an electric SUV in the B-segment, offering two front-wheel drive variants with different battery capacities and power outputs.

Mini Aceman

The Mini Aceman is an electric crossover in the B-segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Kia EV2 vs Mini Aceman

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Kia EV2 or Mini Aceman — who wins where

Kia EV2 leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmKia EV2 +47 km
    Kia EV2
    453
    Mini Aceman
    406
  • Battery kWhKia EV2 +11.8 kWh
    Kia EV2
    61
    Mini Aceman
    49.2
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMini Aceman −0.2 kWh/100 km
    Kia EV2
    15.2
    Mini Aceman
    15
  • Power PSMini Aceman +83 PS
    Kia EV2
    135
    Mini Aceman
    218
  • 0–100 km/h sMini Aceman −2.4 s
    Kia EV2
    9.5
    Mini Aceman
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hMini Aceman +9 km/h
    Kia EV2
    161
    Mini Aceman
    170
  • DC charging kWKia EV2 +23 kW
    Kia EV2
    118
    Mini Aceman
    95
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Kia EV2
    11
    Mini Aceman
    11
  • Charging minKia EV2 −1 min
    Kia EV2
    30
    Mini Aceman
    31
  • Weight kgKia EV2 −155 kg
    Kia EV2
    1555
    Mini Aceman
    1710
  • Boot lKia EV2 +62 l
    Kia EV2
    362
    Mini Aceman
    300

Add a third car

Technical data: Kia EV2 vs Mini Aceman

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Kia EV2 vs Mini Aceman
Key parameters Kia EV2
61 kWh
Mini Aceman
SE
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range453 km406 kmKia +47 km
Battery61 kWh49.2 kWhKia +11.8 kWh
Consumption15.2 kWh/100 km15 kWh/100 kmMini −0.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging118 kW95 kWKia +23 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%30 min31 minKia −1 min
Range per minute of charging10.6 km/min9.2 km/minKia +1.4 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power135 PS218 PSMini +83 PS
0–100 km/h9.5 s7.1 sMini −2.4 s
Top speed161 km/h170 km/hMini +9 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1555 kg1710 kgKia −155 kg
Boot362 l300 lKia +62 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Kia
Length4060 mm4079 mmMini +19 mm
Width1800 mm1754 mmKia +46 mm
Height1575 mm1514 mmKia +61 mm
Wheelbase2565 mm2606 mmMini +41 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Kia EV2

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Mini Aceman

Cost per 100 km4.5
Monthly56
Yearly675

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Kia EV2

Mini Aceman

Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Kia EV2 or Mini Aceman?

The Kia EV2 goes further: 453 km WLTP against the 406 km of the Mini Aceman. That is a difference of 47 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Kia EV2 — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mini Aceman, with 49.2 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Kia EV2 or Mini Aceman?

The Mini Aceman is stronger: 218 PS against the 135 PS of the Kia EV2. The gap is 83 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Kia EV2 takes more: 362 l against 300 l in the Mini Aceman. The difference is 62 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.