Jeep Avenger vs Kia EV2

Biggest differences: Battery — Jeep Avenger 51 kWh, Kia EV2 61 kWh · DC charging — Jeep Avenger 100 kW, Kia EV2 118 kW · Power — Jeep Avenger 156 PS, Kia EV2 135 PS.

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 400 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.

Kia EV2

The Kia EV2 is an electric SUV in the B-segment, offering two front-wheel drive variants with different battery capacities and power outputs.

Profile against the market: Jeep Avenger vs Kia EV2

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Jeep Avenger or Kia EV2 — who wins where

Kia EV2 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmKia EV2 +53 km
    Jeep Avenger
    400
    Kia EV2
    453
  • Battery kWhKia EV2 +10 kWh
    Jeep Avenger
    51
    Kia EV2
    61
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmKia EV2 −0.3 kWh/100 km
    Jeep Avenger
    15.5
    Kia EV2
    15.2
  • Power PSJeep Avenger +21 PS
    Jeep Avenger
    156
    Kia EV2
    135
  • 0–100 km/h sJeep Avenger −0.5 s
    Jeep Avenger
    9
    Kia EV2
    9.5
  • Top speed km/hKia EV2 +11 km/h
    Jeep Avenger
    150
    Kia EV2
    161
  • DC charging kWKia EV2 +18 kW
    Jeep Avenger
    100
    Kia EV2
    118
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Jeep Avenger
    11
    Kia EV2
    11
  • Charging minNo difference
    Jeep Avenger
    30
    Kia EV2
    30
  • Weight kgJeep Avenger −35 kg
    Jeep Avenger
    1520
    Kia EV2
    1555
  • Boot lKia EV2 +7 l
    Jeep Avenger
    355
    Kia EV2
    362

Add a third car

Technical data: Jeep Avenger vs Kia EV2

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Jeep Avenger vs Kia EV2
Key parameters Jeep Avenger
Electric
Kia EV2
61 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range400 km453 kmKia +53 km
Battery51 kWh61 kWhKia +10 kWh
Consumption15.5 kWh/100 km15.2 kWh/100 kmKia −0.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW118 kWKia +18 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%30 min30 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging9.3 km/min10.6 km/minKia +1.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power156 PS135 PSJeep +21 PS
0–100 km/h9 s9.5 sJeep −0.5 s
Top speed150 km/h161 km/hKia +11 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1520 kg1555 kgJeep −35 kg
Boot355 l362 lKia +7 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Kia
Length4084 mm4060 mmJeep +24 mm
Width1776 mm1800 mmKia +24 mm
Height1527 mm1575 mmKia +48 mm
Wheelbase2562 mm2565 mmKia +3 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Jeep Avenger

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Kia EV2

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Jeep Avenger

Kia EV2

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Jeep Avenger or Kia EV2?

The Kia EV2 goes further: 453 km WLTP against the 400 km of the Jeep Avenger. That is a difference of 53 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Kia EV2 — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Jeep Avenger, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The Jeep Avenger accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Kia EV2 up to 118 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 30 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.