JAC E30X vs Lancia Ypsilon

Biggest differences: DC charging — JAC E30X 64 kW, Lancia Ypsilon 100 kW · AC charging — JAC E30X 11 kW, Lancia Ypsilon 7.4 kW · 0–100 km/h — JAC E30X 7.8 s, Lancia Ypsilon 9 s.

JAC E30X

The JAC E30X is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery options and corresponding ranges, all with the same powertrain output.

Lancia Ypsilon

The Lancia Ypsilon is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with two electric powertrain configurations offering different power outputs and performance characteristics.

Profile against the market: JAC E30X vs Lancia Ypsilon

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

JAC E30X or Lancia Ypsilon — who wins where

JAC E30X leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLancia Ypsilon +51 km
    JAC E30X
    374
    Lancia Ypsilon
    425
  • Battery kWhJAC E30X +0.5 kWh
    JAC E30X
    51.5
    Lancia Ypsilon
    51
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmLancia Ypsilon −1.2 kWh/100 km
    JAC E30X
    15.6
    Lancia Ypsilon
    14.4
  • Power PSLancia Ypsilon +20 PS
    JAC E30X
    136
    Lancia Ypsilon
    156
  • 0–100 km/h sJAC E30X −1.2 s
    JAC E30X
    7.8
    Lancia Ypsilon
    9
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    JAC E30X
    150
    Lancia Ypsilon
    150
  • DC charging kWLancia Ypsilon +36 kW
    JAC E30X
    64
    Lancia Ypsilon
    100
  • AC charging kWJAC E30X +3.6 kW
    JAC E30X
    11
    Lancia Ypsilon
    7.4
  • Weight kgJAC E30X −116 kg
    JAC E30X
    1445
    Lancia Ypsilon
    1561
  • Boot lJAC E30X +1 l
    JAC E30X
    310
    Lancia Ypsilon
    309

Add a third car

Technical data: JAC E30X vs Lancia Ypsilon

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: JAC E30X vs Lancia Ypsilon
Key parameters JAC E30X
Nordic Edition 50
Lancia Ypsilon
Electric
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range374 km425 kmLancia +51 km
Battery51.5 kWh51 kWhJAC +0.5 kWh
Consumption15.6 kWh/100 km14.4 kWh/100 kmLancia −1.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging64 kW100 kWLancia +36 kW
AC charging11 kW7.4 kWJAC +3.6 kW
Charging 45 min 30–80%28 min 10–80%17 min
Range per minute of charging4.2 km/min10.6 km/minLancia +6.4 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power136 PS156 PSLancia +20 PS
0–100 km/h7.8 s9 sJAC −1.2 s
Top speed150 km/h150 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1445 kg1561 kgJAC −116 kg
Boot310 l309 lJAC +1 l
Length4025 mm4080 mmLancia +55 mm
Width1770 mm1768 mmJAC +2 mm
Height1560 mm1440 mmJAC +120 mm
Wheelbase2620 mm2545 mmJAC +75 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

JAC E30X

Cost per 100 km4.68
Monthly59
Yearly702

Lancia Ypsilon

Cost per 100 km4.32
Monthly54
Yearly648

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

JAC E30X

Lancia Ypsilon

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — JAC E30X or Lancia Ypsilon?

The Lancia Ypsilon goes further: 425 km WLTP against the 374 km of the JAC E30X. That is a difference of 51 km.

Why does the JAC E30X have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Lancia Ypsilon?

The JAC E30X carries 51.5 kWh and covers 374 km, while the Lancia Ypsilon with its 51 kWh battery does 425 km. Energy use decides it: 15.6 against 14.4 kWh/100 km.

Which charges faster?

The JAC E30X accepts up to 64 kW DC, the Lancia Ypsilon up to 100 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Lancia Ypsilon uses less electricity: 14.4 kWh/100 km against 15.6 kWh/100 km in the JAC E30X. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 180 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.