Hyundai Kona Electric vs Škoda Epiq

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Hyundai Kona Electric 39 min, Škoda Epiq 24 min · Battery — Hyundai Kona Electric 64.8 kWh, Škoda Epiq 52 kWh · WLTP range — Hyundai Kona Electric 510 km, Škoda Epiq 441 km.

Hyundai Kona Electric

The Hyundai Kona Electric is a compact crossover vehicle in the B-segment, offering two battery options and front-wheel drive.

Škoda Epiq

The Škoda Epiq is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering three different motor configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Hyundai Kona Electric vs Škoda Epiq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Hyundai Kona Electric or Škoda Epiq — who wins where

Škoda Epiq leads 8 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmHyundai Kona Electric +69 km
    Hyundai Kona Electric
    510
    Škoda Epiq
    441
  • Battery kWhHyundai Kona Electric +12.8 kWh
    Hyundai Kona Electric
    64.8
    Škoda Epiq
    52
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Epiq −1 kWh/100 km
    Hyundai Kona Electric
    14.7
    Škoda Epiq
    13.7
  • Power PSŠkoda Epiq +7 PS
    Hyundai Kona Electric
    204
    Škoda Epiq
    211
  • 0–100 km/h sŠkoda Epiq −1 s
    Hyundai Kona Electric
    8.1
    Škoda Epiq
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hHyundai Kona Electric +12 km/h
    Hyundai Kona Electric
    172
    Škoda Epiq
    160
  • DC charging kWŠkoda Epiq +3 kW
    Hyundai Kona Electric
    102
    Škoda Epiq
    105
  • AC charging kWŠkoda Epiq +0.6 kW
    Hyundai Kona Electric
    10.4
    Škoda Epiq
    11
  • Charging minŠkoda Epiq −15 min
    Hyundai Kona Electric
    39
    Škoda Epiq
    24
  • Weight kgŠkoda Epiq −155 kg
    Hyundai Kona Electric
    1698
    Škoda Epiq
    1543
  • Boot lŠkoda Epiq +9 l
    Hyundai Kona Electric
    466
    Škoda Epiq
    475

Add a third car

Technical data: Hyundai Kona Electric vs Škoda Epiq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Hyundai Kona Electric vs Škoda Epiq
Key parameters Hyundai Kona Electric
64.8 kWh
Škoda Epiq
55
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range510 km441 kmHyundai +69 km
Battery64.8 kWh52 kWhHyundai +12.8 kWh
Consumption14.7 kWh/100 km13.7 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging102 kW105 kWŠkoda +3 kW
AC charging10.4 kW11 kWŠkoda +0.6 kW
Charging 10–80%39 min24 minŠkoda −15 min
Range per minute of charging9.2 km/min12.9 km/minŠkoda +3.7 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS211 PSŠkoda +7 PS
0–100 km/h8.1 s7.1 sŠkoda −1 s
Top speed172 km/h160 km/hHyundai +12 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1698 kg1543 kgŠkoda −155 kg
Boot466 l475 lŠkoda +9 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4355 mm4171 mmHyundai +184 mm
Width1825 mm1798 mmHyundai +27 mm
Height1575 mm1581 mmŠkoda +6 mm
Wheelbase2660 mm2601 mmHyundai +59 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Hyundai Kona Electric

Cost per 100 km4.41
Monthly55
Yearly661

Škoda Epiq

Cost per 100 km4.11
Monthly51
Yearly616

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Hyundai Kona Electric

Škoda Epiq

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Hyundai Kona Electric or Škoda Epiq?

The Hyundai Kona Electric goes further: 510 km WLTP against the 441 km of the Škoda Epiq. That is a difference of 69 km.

Which charges faster?

The Hyundai Kona Electric accepts up to 102 kW DC, the Škoda Epiq up to 105 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 39 and 24 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Škoda Epiq uses less electricity: 13.7 kWh/100 km against 14.7 kWh/100 km in the Hyundai Kona Electric. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 150 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.