Honda Super-N vs Hyundai IONIQ 3
Biggest differences: Boot — Honda Super-N 162 l, Hyundai IONIQ 3 441 l · WLTP range — Honda Super-N 206 km, Hyundai IONIQ 3 497 km · DC charging — Honda Super-N 50 kW, Hyundai IONIQ 3 115 kW.
Honda Super-N
The Honda Super-N is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 206 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.
Hyundai IONIQ 3
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 is an all-electric hatchback in the B-segment, available with two front-wheel drive variants offering different battery configurations and power outputs.
Profile against the market: Honda Super-N vs Hyundai IONIQ 3
Honda Super-NAdvance
Hyundai IONIQ 3Long Range
Honda Super-N or Hyundai IONIQ 3 — who wins where
Hyundai IONIQ 3 leads 9 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmHyundai IONIQ 3 +291 km
- Battery kWhHyundai IONIQ 3 +33 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmHyundai IONIQ 3 −1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSHyundai IONIQ 3 +40 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sHyundai IONIQ 3 −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai IONIQ 3 +31 km/h
- DC charging kWHyundai IONIQ 3 +65 kW
- AC charging kWHyundai IONIQ 3 +1 kW
- Weight ↓ kgHonda Super-N −458 kg
- Boot lHyundai IONIQ 3 +279 l
Technical data: Honda Super-N vs Hyundai IONIQ 3
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Honda Super-N Advance | Hyundai IONIQ 3 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 206 km | 497 km | Hyundai +291 km |
| Battery | 28 kWh | 61 kWh | Hyundai +33 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.8 kWh/100 km | 13.8 kWh/100 km | Hyundai −1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 50 kW | 115 kW | Hyundai +65 kW |
| AC charging | 10 kW | 11 kW | Hyundai +1 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 15–80% | 30 min 10–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 4.5 km/min | 11.6 km/min | Hyundai +7.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 95 PS | 135 PS | Hyundai +40 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 10 s | 9.6 s | Hyundai −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 134 km/h | 165 km/h | Hyundai +31 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1097 kg | 1555 kg | Honda −458 kg |
| Boot | 162 l | 441 l | Hyundai +279 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Hyundai |
| Length | 3599 mm | 4155 mm | Hyundai +556 mm |
| Width | 1573 mm | 1800 mm | Hyundai +227 mm |
| Height | 1608 mm | 1505 mm | Honda +103 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2516 mm | 2680 mm | Hyundai +164 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Honda Super-N
Hyundai IONIQ 3
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Honda Super-N
Hyundai IONIQ 3
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Honda Super-N or Hyundai IONIQ 3?
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 goes further: 497 km WLTP against the 206 km of the Honda Super-N. That is a difference of 291 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Hyundai IONIQ 3 — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Honda Super-N, with 28 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Honda Super-N or Hyundai IONIQ 3?
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 is stronger: 135 PS against the 95 PS of the Honda Super-N. The gap is 40 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 takes more: 441 l against 162 l in the Honda Super-N. The difference is 279 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.