GWM Ora 03 vs JAC E30X

Biggest differences: Boot — GWM Ora 03 228 l, JAC E30X 310 l · Power — GWM Ora 03 171 PS, JAC E30X 136 PS · Battery — GWM Ora 03 63 kWh, JAC E30X 51.5 kWh.

GWM Ora 03

The GWM Ora 03 is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery capacity options while maintaining the same power output for the powertrain.

JAC E30X

The JAC E30X is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery options and corresponding ranges, all with the same powertrain output.

Profile against the market: GWM Ora 03 vs JAC E30X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

GWM Ora 03 or JAC E30X — who wins where

GWM Ora 03 leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmGWM Ora 03 +46 km
    GWM Ora 03
    420
    JAC E30X
    374
  • Battery kWhGWM Ora 03 +11.5 kWh
    GWM Ora 03
    63
    JAC E30X
    51.5
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmJAC E30X −0.9 kWh/100 km
    GWM Ora 03
    16.5
    JAC E30X
    15.6
  • Power PSGWM Ora 03 +35 PS
    GWM Ora 03
    171
    JAC E30X
    136
  • 0–100 km/h sJAC E30X −0.4 s
    GWM Ora 03
    8.2
    JAC E30X
    7.8
  • Top speed km/hGWM Ora 03 +10 km/h
    GWM Ora 03
    160
    JAC E30X
    150
  • DC charging kWGWM Ora 03 +3 kW
    GWM Ora 03
    67
    JAC E30X
    64
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    GWM Ora 03
    11
    JAC E30X
    11
  • Weight kgJAC E30X −135 kg
    GWM Ora 03
    1580
    JAC E30X
    1445
  • Boot lJAC E30X +82 l
    GWM Ora 03
    228
    JAC E30X
    310

Add a third car

Technical data: GWM Ora 03 vs JAC E30X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: GWM Ora 03 vs JAC E30X
Key parameters GWM Ora 03
63 kWh
JAC E30X
Nordic Edition 50
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range420 km374 kmGWM Ora +46 km
Battery63 kWh51.5 kWhGWM Ora +11.5 kWh
Consumption16.5 kWh/100 km15.6 kWh/100 kmJAC −0.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging67 kW64 kWGWM Ora +3 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 48 min 15–80%45 min 30–80%3 min
Range per minute of charging5.7 km/min4.2 km/minGWM Ora +1.5 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power171 PS136 PSGWM Ora +35 PS
0–100 km/h8.2 s7.8 sJAC −0.4 s
Top speed160 km/h150 km/hGWM Ora +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1580 kg1445 kgJAC −135 kg
Boot228 l310 lJAC +82 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly GWM Ora
Length4235 mm4025 mmGWM Ora +210 mm
Width1825 mm1770 mmGWM Ora +55 mm
Height1603 mm1560 mmGWM Ora +43 mm
Wheelbase2650 mm2620 mmGWM Ora +30 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

GWM Ora 03

Cost per 100 km4.95
Monthly62
Yearly743

JAC E30X

Cost per 100 km4.68
Monthly59
Yearly702

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

GWM Ora 03

JAC E30X

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — GWM Ora 03 or JAC E30X?

The GWM Ora 03 goes further: 420 km WLTP against the 374 km of the JAC E30X. That is a difference of 46 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the GWM Ora 03 — its 63 kWh battery then works as a power source. The JAC E30X, with 51.5 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The JAC E30X takes more: 310 l against 228 l in the GWM Ora 03. The difference is 82 l.

Which charges faster?

The GWM Ora 03 accepts up to 67 kW DC, the JAC E30X up to 64 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.