GAC Aion UT vs Kia EV4

Biggest differences: DC charging — GAC Aion UT 87 kW, Kia EV4 128 kW · WLTP range — GAC Aion UT 430 km, Kia EV4 625 km · Battery — GAC Aion UT 60 kWh, Kia EV4 81.4 kWh.

GAC Aion UT

The GAC Aion UT is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of 430 km according to the WLTP cycle and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds.

Kia EV4

The Kia EV4 is an all-electric hatchback in the C segment that offers three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: GAC Aion UT vs Kia EV4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

GAC Aion UT or Kia EV4 — who wins where

Kia EV4 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmKia EV4 +195 km
    GAC Aion UT
    430
    Kia EV4
    625
  • Battery kWhKia EV4 +21.4 kWh
    GAC Aion UT
    60
    Kia EV4
    81.4
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmKia EV4 −1.8 kWh/100 km
    GAC Aion UT
    16.4
    Kia EV4
    14.6
  • Power PSNo difference
    GAC Aion UT
    204
    Kia EV4
    204
  • 0–100 km/h sGAC Aion UT −0.4 s
    GAC Aion UT
    7.3
    Kia EV4
    7.7
  • Top speed km/hKia EV4 +10 km/h
    GAC Aion UT
    160
    Kia EV4
    170
  • DC charging kWKia EV4 +41 kW
    GAC Aion UT
    87
    Kia EV4
    128
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    GAC Aion UT
    11
    Kia EV4
    11
  • Charging minKia EV4 −1 min
    GAC Aion UT
    32
    Kia EV4
    31
  • Weight kgGAC Aion UT −176 kg
    GAC Aion UT
    1645
    Kia EV4
    1821
  • Boot lGAC Aion UT +5 l
    GAC Aion UT
    440
    Kia EV4
    435

Add a third car

Technical data: GAC Aion UT vs Kia EV4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: GAC Aion UT vs Kia EV4
Key parameters GAC Aion UT
60 kWh
Kia EV4
81.4 kWh FWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range430 km625 kmKia +195 km
Battery60 kWh81.4 kWhKia +21.4 kWh
Consumption16.4 kWh/100 km14.6 kWh/100 kmKia −1.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging87 kW128 kWKia +41 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%32 min31 minKia −1 min
Range per minute of charging9.4 km/min14.1 km/minKia +4.7 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS204 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h7.3 s7.7 sGAC −0.4 s
Top speed160 km/h170 km/hKia +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1645 kg1821 kgGAC −176 kg
Boot440 l435 lGAC +5 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4270 mm4430 mmKia +160 mm
Width1850 mm1860 mmKia +10 mm
Height1575 mm1485 mmGAC +90 mm
Wheelbase2750 mm2820 mmKia +70 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

GAC Aion UT

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Kia EV4

Cost per 100 km4.38
Monthly55
Yearly657

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

GAC Aion UT

Kia EV4

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — GAC Aion UT or Kia EV4?

The Kia EV4 goes further: 625 km WLTP against the 430 km of the GAC Aion UT. That is a difference of 195 km.

Which charges faster?

The GAC Aion UT accepts up to 87 kW DC, the Kia EV4 up to 128 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 32 and 31 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Kia EV4 uses less electricity: 14.6 kWh/100 km against 16.4 kWh/100 km in the GAC Aion UT. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 270 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.