Ford Explorer vs Smart #5

Smart #5 leads 4 to 3

Biggest differences: DC charging — Ford Explorer 183 kW, Smart #5 400 kW · Consumption — Ford Explorer 13.1 kWh/100 km, Smart #5 18.4 kWh/100 km · Power — Ford Explorer 286 PS, Smart #5 363 PS.

Ford Explorer

Ford Explorer is a D-segment SUV, in model year 2027 in three variants: WLTP range from 444 to 602 km, power from 190 to 340 hp.

Smart #5

Smart #5 is a D-segment SUV offering four drivetrain variants with power ranging from 340 hp to 646 hp.

Profile against the market: Ford Explorer vs Smart #5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Ford Explorer or Smart #5 — who wins where

Smart #5 leads 4 to 3

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmFord Explorer +12 km
    Ford Explorer
    602
    Smart #5
    590
  • Battery kWhSmart #5 +15 kWh
    Ford Explorer
    79
    Smart #5
    94
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Explorer −5.3 kWh/100 km
    Ford Explorer
    13.1
    Smart #5
    18.4
  • Power PSSmart #5 +77 PS
    Ford Explorer
    286
    Smart #5
    363
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sFord Explorer −0.1 s
    Ford Explorer
    6.4
    Smart #5
    6.5
  • Top speed km/hSmart #5 +20 km/h
    Ford Explorer
    180
    Smart #5
    200
  • DC charging kWSmart #5 +217 kW
    Ford Explorer
    183
    Smart #5
    400
  • AC charging kWNo data
    Ford Explorer
    —
    Smart #5
    22
  • Charging ↓ minNo data
    Ford Explorer
    —
    Smart #5
    18
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    Ford Explorer
    —
    Smart #5
    2260
  • Boot lNo data
    Ford Explorer
    —
    Smart #5
    630

Add a third car

Technical data: Ford Explorer vs Smart #5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Ford Explorer vs Smart #5
Key parameters Ford Explorer
Extended Range RWD · 2027 model year
Smart #5
Pro+
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range602 km590 kmFord +12 km
Battery79 kWh94 kWhSmart +15 kWh
Consumption ↓13.1 kWh/100 km18.4 kWh/100 kmFord −5.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW400 kWSmart +217 kW
AC charging—22 kW—
Charging 10–80% ↓—18 min—
Range per minute of charging—22.9 km/min—
Voltage—800 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS363 PSSmart +77 PS
0–100 km/h ↓6.4 s6.5 sFord −0.1 s
Top speed180 km/h200 km/hSmart +20 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓—2260 kg—
Boot—630 l—
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Smart
Length—4695 mm—
Width—1920 mm—
Height—1705 mm—
Wheelbase—2900 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Ford Explorer

Cost per 100 km3.93
Monthly49
Yearly589

Smart #5

Cost per 100 km5.52
Monthly69
Yearly828

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Ford Explorer

Smart #5

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the Smart #5 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Ford Explorer?

The Smart #5 carries 94 kWh and covers 590 km, while the Ford Explorer with its 79 kWh battery does 602 km. Energy use decides it: 18.4 against 13.1 kWh/100 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Smart #5 — its 94 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Ford Explorer, with 79 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The Ford Explorer accepts up to 183 kW DC, the Smart #5 up to 400 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Ford Explorer uses less electricity: 13.1 kWh/100 km against 18.4 kWh/100 km in the Smart #5. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 795 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.