Fiat Grande Panda vs JAC E30X

Biggest differences: DC charging — Fiat Grande Panda 100 kW, JAC E30X 64 kW · 0–100 km/h — Fiat Grande Panda 11.5 s, JAC E30X 7.8 s · Power — Fiat Grande Panda 113 PS, JAC E30X 136 PS.

Fiat Grande Panda

The Fiat Grande Panda is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offering a range of 320 km according to the WLTP cycle and front-wheel drive.

JAC E30X

The JAC E30X is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery options and corresponding ranges, all with the same powertrain output.

Profile against the market: Fiat Grande Panda vs JAC E30X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Fiat Grande Panda or JAC E30X — who wins where

JAC E30X leads 7 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmJAC E30X +54 km
    Fiat Grande Panda
    320
    JAC E30X
    374
  • Battery kWhJAC E30X +7.5 kWh
    Fiat Grande Panda
    44
    JAC E30X
    51.5
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmJAC E30X −1.2 kWh/100 km
    Fiat Grande Panda
    16.8
    JAC E30X
    15.6
  • Power PSJAC E30X +23 PS
    Fiat Grande Panda
    113
    JAC E30X
    136
  • 0–100 km/h sJAC E30X −3.7 s
    Fiat Grande Panda
    11.5
    JAC E30X
    7.8
  • Top speed km/hJAC E30X +18 km/h
    Fiat Grande Panda
    132
    JAC E30X
    150
  • DC charging kWFiat Grande Panda +36 kW
    Fiat Grande Panda
    100
    JAC E30X
    64
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Fiat Grande Panda
    11
    JAC E30X
    11
  • Weight kgJAC E30X −112 kg
    Fiat Grande Panda
    1557
    JAC E30X
    1445
  • Boot lFiat Grande Panda +51 l
    Fiat Grande Panda
    361
    JAC E30X
    310

Add a third car

Technical data: Fiat Grande Panda vs JAC E30X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Fiat Grande Panda vs JAC E30X
Key parameters Fiat Grande Panda
La Prima
JAC E30X
Nordic Edition 50
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range320 km374 kmJAC +54 km
Battery44 kWh51.5 kWhJAC +7.5 kWh
Consumption16.8 kWh/100 km15.6 kWh/100 kmJAC −1.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW64 kWFiat +36 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 27 min 20–80%45 min 30–80%18 min
Range per minute of charging7.1 km/min4.2 km/minFiat +2.9 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power113 PS136 PSJAC +23 PS
0–100 km/h11.5 s7.8 sJAC −3.7 s
Top speed132 km/h150 km/hJAC +18 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1557 kg1445 kgJAC −112 kg
Boot361 l310 lFiat +51 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Fiat
Length3999 mm4025 mmJAC +26 mm
Width1763 mm1770 mmJAC +7 mm
Height1576 mm1560 mmFiat +16 mm
Wheelbase2540 mm2620 mmJAC +80 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Fiat Grande Panda

Cost per 100 km5.04
Monthly63
Yearly756

JAC E30X

Cost per 100 km4.68
Monthly59
Yearly702

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Fiat Grande Panda

JAC E30X

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Fiat Grande Panda or JAC E30X?

The JAC E30X goes further: 374 km WLTP against the 320 km of the Fiat Grande Panda. That is a difference of 54 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Fiat Grande Panda — its 44 kWh battery then works as a power source. The JAC E30X, with 51.5 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Fiat Grande Panda takes more: 361 l against 310 l in the JAC E30X. The difference is 51 l.

Which charges faster?

The Fiat Grande Panda accepts up to 100 kW DC, the JAC E30X up to 64 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.