Elaris BEO vs Škoda Peaq

Biggest differences: Boot — Elaris BEO 467 l, Škoda Peaq 935 l · DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Škoda Peaq 199 kW · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Škoda Peaq 286 PS.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Škoda Peaq

The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Škoda Peaq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Škoda Peaq — who wins where

Škoda Peaq leads 6 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Peaq +158 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Škoda Peaq
    647
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Škoda Peaq
    86
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Peaq −4.3 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Škoda Peaq
    15
  • Power PSŠkoda Peaq +82 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Škoda Peaq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Škoda Peaq
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hŠkoda Peaq +30 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Škoda Peaq
    180
  • DC charging kWŠkoda Peaq +99 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Škoda Peaq
    199
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Škoda Peaq
    11
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −279 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Škoda Peaq
    2234
  • Boot lŠkoda Peaq +468 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Škoda Peaq
    935

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Škoda Peaq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Škoda Peaq
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Škoda Peaq
90
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km647 kmŠkoda +158 km
Battery86 kWh86 kWhNo difference
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km15 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −4.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW199 kWŠkoda +99 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 20–80%28 min 10–80%17 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min16.2 km/minŠkoda +9.7 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS286 PSŠkoda +82 PS
0–100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed150 km/h180 km/hŠkoda +30 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1955 kg2234 kgElaris −279 kg
Boot467 l935 lŠkoda +468 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Škoda
Length4698 mm4874 mmŠkoda +176 mm
Width1908 mm1867 mmElaris +41 mm
Height1696 mm1664 mmElaris +32 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2965 mmŠkoda +165 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Škoda Peaq

Cost per 100 km4.5
Monthly56
Yearly675

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Škoda Peaq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Škoda Peaq?

The Škoda Peaq goes further: 647 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 158 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Škoda Peaq differ?

The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Škoda Peaq has RWD and 286 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Škoda Peaq — its 86 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Elaris BEO or Škoda Peaq?

The Škoda Peaq is stronger: 286 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 82 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.