Elaris BEO vs Škoda Enyaq
Biggest differences: Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Škoda Enyaq 286 PS · DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Škoda Enyaq 135 kW · Consumption — Elaris BEO 19.3 kWh/100 km, Škoda Enyaq 14.9 kWh/100 km.
Elaris BEO
The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.
Škoda Enyaq
The Škoda Enyaq is an SUV in the D segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power and range, and boasts a luggage capacity of 585 liters.
Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Škoda Enyaq
- Elaris BEOStandard
Škoda Enyaq85
Elaris BEO or Škoda Enyaq — who wins where
Škoda Enyaq leads 6 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Enyaq +92 km
- Battery kWhElaris BEO +9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Enyaq −4.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Enyaq +82 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Enyaq +30 km/h
- DC charging kWŠkoda Enyaq +35 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgElaris BEO −111 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Enyaq +118 l
Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Škoda Enyaq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Elaris BEO Standard | Škoda Enyaq 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 489 km | 581 km | Škoda +92 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 77 kWh | Elaris +9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.3 kWh/100 km | 14.9 kWh/100 km | Škoda −4.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 135 kW | Škoda +35 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 20–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 17 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.5 km/min | 14.5 km/min | Škoda +8 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +82 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 6.7 s | — |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1955 kg | 2066 kg | Elaris −111 kg |
| Boot | 467 l | 585 l | Škoda +118 l |
| Length | 4698 mm | 4658 mm | Elaris +40 mm |
| Width | 1908 mm | 1879 mm | Elaris +29 mm |
| Height | 1696 mm | 1622 mm | Elaris +74 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2800 mm | 2766 mm | Elaris +34 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Elaris BEO
Škoda Enyaq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Elaris BEO
Škoda Enyaq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Škoda Enyaq?
The Škoda Enyaq goes further: 581 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 92 km.
Why does the Elaris BEO have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Škoda Enyaq?
The Elaris BEO carries 86 kWh and covers 489 km, while the Škoda Enyaq with its 77 kWh battery does 581 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 14.9 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Škoda Enyaq differ?
The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Škoda Enyaq has RWD and 286 PS.
Which is more powerful — Elaris BEO or Škoda Enyaq?
The Škoda Enyaq is stronger: 286 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 82 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.