Elaris BEO vs Mercedes GLC

Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Mercedes GLC 330 kW · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Mercedes GLC 490 PS · WLTP range — Elaris BEO 489 km, Mercedes GLC 715 km.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Mercedes GLC

The Mercedes GLC is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering both rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as a long driving range.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Mercedes GLC

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Mercedes GLC — who wins where

Mercedes GLC leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMercedes GLC +226 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Mercedes GLC
    715
  • Battery kWhMercedes GLC +8 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Mercedes GLC
    94
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMercedes GLC −4.4 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Mercedes GLC
    14.9
  • Power PSMercedes GLC +286 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Mercedes GLC
    490
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Mercedes GLC
    4.3
  • Top speed km/hMercedes GLC +60 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Mercedes GLC
    210
  • DC charging kWMercedes GLC +230 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Mercedes GLC
    330
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Mercedes GLC
    11
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −505 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Mercedes GLC
    2460
  • Boot lMercedes GLC +103 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Mercedes GLC
    570

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Mercedes GLC

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Mercedes GLC
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Mercedes GLC
GLC 400 4MATIC
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km715 kmMercedes +226 km
Battery86 kWh94 kWhMercedes +8 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km14.9 kWh/100 kmMercedes −4.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW330 kWMercedes +230 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 20–80%22 min 10–80%23 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min22.7 km/minMercedes +16.2 km/min
Voltage800 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS490 PSMercedes +286 PS
0–100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed150 km/h210 km/hMercedes +60 km/h
DrivetrainFWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1955 kg2460 kgElaris −505 kg
Boot467 l570 lMercedes +103 l
Length4698 mm4845 mmMercedes +147 mm
Width1908 mm1913 mmMercedes +5 mm
Height1696 mm1644 mmElaris +52 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2972 mmMercedes +172 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Mercedes GLC

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Mercedes GLC

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Mercedes GLC?

The Mercedes GLC goes further: 715 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 226 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Mercedes GLC differ?

The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Mercedes GLC has AWD and 490 PS.

Which is more powerful — Elaris BEO or Mercedes GLC?

The Mercedes GLC is stronger: 490 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 286 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Mercedes GLC takes more: 570 l against 467 l in the Elaris BEO. The difference is 103 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.