Elaris BEO vs Hyundai Ioniq 5
Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Hyundai Ioniq 5 260 kW · Top speed — Elaris BEO 150 km/h, Hyundai Ioniq 5 185 km/h · Consumption — Elaris BEO 19.3 kWh/100 km, Hyundai Ioniq 5 16 kWh/100 km.
Elaris BEO
The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.
Hyundai Ioniq 5
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a crossover vehicle in the D segment, offering three different powertrain options with WLTP ranges reaching up to 570 km.
Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Hyundai Ioniq 5
- Elaris BEOStandard
Hyundai Ioniq 584 kWh RWD
Elaris BEO or Hyundai Ioniq 5 — who wins where
Hyundai Ioniq 5 leads 6 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmHyundai Ioniq 5 +81 km
- Battery kWhElaris BEO +2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmHyundai Ioniq 5 −3.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSHyundai Ioniq 5 +25 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hHyundai Ioniq 5 +35 km/h
- DC charging kWHyundai Ioniq 5 +160 kW
- AC charging kWElaris BEO +0.5 kW
- Weight ↓ kgElaris BEO −30 kg
- Boot lHyundai Ioniq 5 +53 l
Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Hyundai Ioniq 5
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Elaris BEO Standard | Hyundai Ioniq 5 84 kWh RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 489 km | 570 km | Hyundai +81 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 84 kWh | Elaris +2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.3 kWh/100 km | 16 kWh/100 km | Hyundai −3.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 260 kW | Hyundai +160 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 10.5 kW | Elaris +0.5 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 20–80% | 18 min 10–80% | 27 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.5 km/min | 22.2 km/min | Hyundai +15.7 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 229 PS | Hyundai +25 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 7.5 s | — |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 185 km/h | Hyundai +35 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1955 kg | 1985 kg | Elaris −30 kg |
| Boot | 467 l | 520 l | Hyundai +53 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Hyundai |
| Length | 4698 mm | 4655 mm | Elaris +43 mm |
| Width | 1908 mm | 1890 mm | Elaris +18 mm |
| Height | 1696 mm | 1605 mm | Elaris +91 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2800 mm | 3000 mm | Hyundai +200 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Elaris BEO
Hyundai Ioniq 5
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Elaris BEO
Hyundai Ioniq 5
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Hyundai Ioniq 5?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 goes further: 570 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 81 km.
Why does the Elaris BEO have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Hyundai Ioniq 5?
The Elaris BEO carries 86 kWh and covers 489 km, while the Hyundai Ioniq 5 with its 84 kWh battery does 570 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 16 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Hyundai Ioniq 5 differ?
The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 has RWD and 229 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Hyundai Ioniq 5 — its 84 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.