Elaris BEO vs Ford Explorer

Biggest differences: Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Ford Explorer 286 PS · DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Ford Explorer 135 kW · Consumption — Elaris BEO 19.3 kWh/100 km, Ford Explorer 14.5 kWh/100 km.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Ford Explorer

The Ford Explorer is an SUV in the D-segment, offering three versions with electric powertrains, one of which, the Extended Range model, provides a range exceeding 560 kilometers.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Ford Explorer

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Ford Explorer — who wins where

Ford Explorer leads 6 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmFord Explorer +113 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Ford Explorer
    602
  • Battery kWhElaris BEO +9 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Ford Explorer
    77
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmFord Explorer −4.8 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Ford Explorer
    14.5
  • Power PSFord Explorer +82 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Ford Explorer
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Ford Explorer
    6.4
  • Top speed km/hFord Explorer +30 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Ford Explorer
    180
  • DC charging kWFord Explorer +35 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Ford Explorer
    135
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Ford Explorer
    11
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −60 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Ford Explorer
    2015
  • Boot lFord Explorer +3 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Ford Explorer
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Ford Explorer

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Ford Explorer
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Ford Explorer
Extended Range RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km602 kmFord +113 km
Battery86 kWh77 kWhElaris +9 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km14.5 kWh/100 kmFord −4.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW135 kWFord +35 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 20–80%28 min 10–80%17 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min15.1 km/minFord +8.6 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS286 PSFord +82 PS
0–100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed150 km/h180 km/hFord +30 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1955 kg2015 kgElaris −60 kg
Boot467 l470 lFord +3 l
Length4698 mm4468 mmElaris +230 mm
Width1908 mm1872 mmElaris +36 mm
Height1696 mm1630 mmElaris +66 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2767 mmElaris +33 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Ford Explorer

Cost per 100 km4.35
Monthly54
Yearly652

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Ford Explorer

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Ford Explorer?

The Ford Explorer goes further: 602 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 113 km.

Why does the Elaris BEO have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Ford Explorer?

The Elaris BEO carries 86 kWh and covers 489 km, while the Ford Explorer with its 77 kWh battery does 602 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 14.5 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Ford Explorer differ?

The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Ford Explorer has RWD and 286 PS.

Which is more powerful — Elaris BEO or Ford Explorer?

The Ford Explorer is stronger: 286 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 82 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.