Citroën ë-SpaceTourer vs Opel Zafira Electric
Biggest differences: Weight — Citroën ë-SpaceTourer 2136 kg, Opel Zafira Electric 2202 kg.
Citroën ë-SpaceTourer
The Citroën ë-SpaceTourer is an electric van in the D segment, offering two different range options and a power output of 136 horsepower.
Opel Zafira Electric
The Opel Zafira Electric is an electric van in the D-segment, offering two battery and range options, both with front-wheel drive.
Profile against the market: Citroën ë-SpaceTourer vs Opel Zafira Electric
Citroën ë-SpaceTourerM 75 kWh
Opel Zafira Electric75 kWh
Citroën ë-SpaceTourer or Opel Zafira Electric — who wins where
Opel Zafira Electric leads 3 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmOpel Zafira Electric +4 km
- Battery kWhCitroën ë-SpaceTourer +0.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmOpel Zafira Electric −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hOpel Zafira Electric +2 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgCitroën ë-SpaceTourer −66 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Citroën ë-SpaceTourer vs Opel Zafira Electric
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Citroën ë-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh | Opel Zafira Electric 75 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 349 km | 353 km | Opel +4 km |
| Battery | 69.5 kWh | 69 kWh | Citroën +0.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 23.8 kWh/100 km | 23.6 kWh/100 km | Opel −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 0–80% | 45 min 5–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.2 km/min | 5.9 km/min | Citroën +0.3 km/min |
| Voltage | — | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 136 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 14.2 s | — |
| Top speed | 130 km/h | 132 km/h | Opel +2 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2136 kg | 2202 kg | Citroën −66 kg |
| Boot | — | — | — |
| Length | 4980 mm | 4980 mm | No difference |
| Width | 1920 mm | 2010 mm | Opel +90 mm |
| Height | 1890 mm | 1890 mm | No difference |
| Wheelbase | 3275 mm | 3275 mm | No difference |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Citroën ë-SpaceTourer
Opel Zafira Electric
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Citroën ë-SpaceTourer
Opel Zafira Electric
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment D
Citroën ë-SpaceTourervs
Peugeot E-TravellerCitroën ë-SpaceTourervs
Volkswagen e-Transporter KombiCitroën ë-SpaceTourervsVolkswagen ID. BuzzCitroën ë-SpaceTourervs
Maxus MIFA 7Opel Zafira ElectricvsVolkswagen e-Transporter KombiOpel Zafira ElectricvsPeugeot E-TravellerOpel Zafira ElectricvsVolkswagen ID. BuzzOpel Zafira ElectricvsMaxus MIFA 7Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Citroën ë-SpaceTourer have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Opel Zafira Electric?
The Citroën ë-SpaceTourer carries 69.5 kWh and covers 349 km, while the Opel Zafira Electric with its 69 kWh battery does 353 km. Energy use decides it: 23.8 against 23.6 kWh/100 km.
Which charges faster?
The Citroën ë-SpaceTourer accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Opel Zafira Electric up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.