Citroën ë-C3 vs Peugeot e-208
Peugeot e-208 leads 6 to 2
Biggest differences: Power — Citroën ë-C3 113 PS, Peugeot e-208 156 PS · WLTP range — Citroën ë-C3 320 km, Peugeot e-208 433 km · 0–100 km/h — Citroën ë-C3 11 s, Peugeot e-208 8.2 s.
Citroën ë-C3
The Citroën ë-C3 is an all-electric hatchback in the B-segment, available with two battery options offering different ranges and charging capabilities.
Peugeot e-208
Peugeot e-208 is a B-segment hatchback in three variants: WLTP range from 361 to 433 km, power from 136 to 281 hp.
Profile against the market: Citroën ë-C3 vs Peugeot e-208
Citroën ë-C3Electric 113
Peugeot e-208GT 156
Citroën ë-C3 or Peugeot e-208 — who wins where
Peugeot e-208 leads 6 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot e-208 +113 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot e-208 +7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPeugeot e-208 −0.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot e-208 +43 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPeugeot e-208 −2.8 s
- Top speed km/hPeugeot e-208 +15 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgCitroën ë-C3 −55 kg
- Boot lCitroën ë-C3 +1 l
Technical data: Citroën ë-C3 vs Peugeot e-208
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Citroën ë-C3 Electric 113 | Peugeot e-208 GT 156 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 320 km | 433 km | Peugeot +113 km |
| Battery | 44 kWh | 51 kWh | Peugeot +7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.5 kWh/100 km | 14.9 kWh/100 km | Peugeot −0.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 26 min 20–80% | 35 min 0–80% | 9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 7.4 km/min | 9.9 km/min | Peugeot +2.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 113 PS | 156 PS | Peugeot +43 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 11 s | 8.2 s | Peugeot −2.8 s |
| Top speed | 135 km/h | 150 km/h | Peugeot +15 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1400 kg | 1455 kg | Citroën −55 kg |
| Boot | 310 l | 309 l | Citroën +1 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4015 mm | 4055 mm | Peugeot +40 mm |
| Width | 1755 mm | 1745 mm | Citroën +10 mm |
| Height | 1577 mm | 1430 mm | Citroën +147 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2540 mm | 2540 mm | No difference |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Citroën ë-C3
Peugeot e-208
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Citroën ë-C3
Peugeot e-208
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Citroën ë-C3 or Peugeot e-208?
The Peugeot e-208 goes further: 433 km WLTP against the 320 km of the Citroën ë-C3. That is a difference of 113 km.
Which is more powerful — Citroën ë-C3 or Peugeot e-208?
The Peugeot e-208 is stronger: 156 PS against the 113 PS of the Citroën ë-C3. The gap is 43 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Citroën ë-C3 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Peugeot e-208 up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Peugeot e-208 uses less electricity: 14.9 kWh/100 km against 15.5 kWh/100 km in the Citroën ë-C3. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 90 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.