Citroën ë-C3 vs Honda Super-N
Biggest differences: DC charging — Citroën ë-C3 100 kW, Honda Super-N 50 kW · Boot — Citroën ë-C3 310 l, Honda Super-N 162 l · Battery — Citroën ë-C3 44 kWh, Honda Super-N 28 kWh.
Citroën ë-C3
The Citroën ë-C3 is an all-electric hatchback in the B-segment, available with two battery options offering different ranges and charging capabilities.
Honda Super-N
The Honda Super-N is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 206 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Citroën ë-C3 vs Honda Super-N
Citroën ë-C3Electric 113
Honda Super-NAdvance
Citroën ë-C3 or Honda Super-N — who wins where
Citroën ë-C3 leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmCitroën ë-C3 +114 km
- Battery kWhCitroën ë-C3 +16 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmHonda Super-N −0.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSCitroën ë-C3 +18 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sHonda Super-N −1 s
- Top speed km/hCitroën ë-C3 +1 km/h
- DC charging kWCitroën ë-C3 +50 kW
- AC charging kWCitroën ë-C3 +1 kW
- Weight ↓ kgHonda Super-N −303 kg
- Boot lCitroën ë-C3 +148 l
Technical data: Citroën ë-C3 vs Honda Super-N
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Citroën ë-C3 Electric 113 | Honda Super-N Advance | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 320 km | 206 km | Citroën +114 km |
| Battery | 44 kWh | 28 kWh | Citroën +16 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.5 kWh/100 km | 14.8 kWh/100 km | Honda −0.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 50 kW | Citroën +50 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 10 kW | Citroën +1 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 26 min 20–80% | 30 min 15–80% | 4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 7.4 km/min | 4.5 km/min | Citroën +2.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 113 PS | 95 PS | Citroën +18 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 11 s | 10 s | Honda −1 s |
| Top speed | 135 km/h | 134 km/h | Citroën +1 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1400 kg | 1097 kg | Honda −303 kg |
| Boot | 310 l | 162 l | Citroën +148 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Citroën |
| Length | 4015 mm | 3599 mm | Citroën +416 mm |
| Width | 1755 mm | 1573 mm | Citroën +182 mm |
| Height | 1577 mm | 1608 mm | Honda +31 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2540 mm | 2516 mm | Citroën +24 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Citroën ë-C3
Honda Super-N
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Citroën ë-C3
Honda Super-N
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Citroën ë-C3 or Honda Super-N?
The Citroën ë-C3 goes further: 320 km WLTP against the 206 km of the Honda Super-N. That is a difference of 114 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Citroën ë-C3 — its 44 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Honda Super-N, with 28 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Citroën ë-C3 takes more: 310 l against 162 l in the Honda Super-N. The difference is 148 l.
Which charges faster?
The Citroën ë-C3 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Honda Super-N up to 50 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.