Changan Deepal S07 vs Škoda Peaq

Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Škoda Peaq 199 kW · Boot — Changan Deepal S07 510 l, Škoda Peaq 935 l · WLTP range — Changan Deepal S07 475 km, Škoda Peaq 647 km.

Changan Deepal S07

The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.

Škoda Peaq

The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.

Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Škoda Peaq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Changan Deepal S07 or Škoda Peaq — who wins where

Škoda Peaq leads 7 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Peaq +172 km
    Changan Deepal S07
    475
    Škoda Peaq
    647
  • Battery kWhŠkoda Peaq +6 kWh
    Changan Deepal S07
    79.97
    Škoda Peaq
    86
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Peaq −3.6 kWh/100 km
    Changan Deepal S07
    18.6
    Škoda Peaq
    15
  • Power PSŠkoda Peaq +68 PS
    Changan Deepal S07
    218
    Škoda Peaq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sŠkoda Peaq −0.8 s
    Changan Deepal S07
    7.9
    Škoda Peaq
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Changan Deepal S07
    180
    Škoda Peaq
    180
  • DC charging kWŠkoda Peaq +107 kW
    Changan Deepal S07
    92
    Škoda Peaq
    199
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Changan Deepal S07
    11
    Škoda Peaq
    11
  • Weight kgChangan Deepal S07 −161 kg
    Changan Deepal S07
    2073
    Škoda Peaq
    2234
  • Boot lŠkoda Peaq +425 l
    Changan Deepal S07
    510
    Škoda Peaq
    935

Add a third car

Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Škoda Peaq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Škoda Peaq
Key parameters Changan Deepal S07
RWD
Škoda Peaq
90
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range475 km647 kmŠkoda +172 km
Battery79.97 kWh86 kWhŠkoda +6 kWh
Consumption18.6 kWh/100 km15 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −3.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging92 kW199 kWŠkoda +107 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 35 min 30–80%28 min 10–80%7 min
Range per minute of charging6.8 km/min16.2 km/minŠkoda +9.4 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power218 PS286 PSŠkoda +68 PS
0–100 km/h7.9 s7.1 sŠkoda −0.8 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2073 kg2234 kgChangan −161 kg
Boot510 l935 lŠkoda +425 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4750 mm4874 mmŠkoda +124 mm
Width1930 mm1867 mmChangan +63 mm
Height1625 mm1664 mmŠkoda +39 mm
Wheelbase2900 mm2965 mmŠkoda +65 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Changan Deepal S07

Cost per 100 km5.58
Monthly70
Yearly837

Škoda Peaq

Cost per 100 km4.5
Monthly56
Yearly675

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Changan Deepal S07

Škoda Peaq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S07 or Škoda Peaq?

The Škoda Peaq goes further: 647 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 172 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Peaq takes more: 935 l against 510 l in the Changan Deepal S07. The difference is 425 l.

Which charges faster?

The Changan Deepal S07 accepts up to 92 kW DC, the Škoda Peaq up to 199 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Škoda Peaq uses less electricity: 15 kWh/100 km against 18.6 kWh/100 km in the Changan Deepal S07. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 540 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.