Changan Deepal S07 vs Škoda Enyaq
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Škoda Enyaq 135 kW · Power — Changan Deepal S07 218 PS, Škoda Enyaq 286 PS · Consumption — Changan Deepal S07 18.6 kWh/100 km, Škoda Enyaq 14.9 kWh/100 km.
Changan Deepal S07
The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.
Škoda Enyaq
The Škoda Enyaq is an SUV in the D segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power and range, and boasts a luggage capacity of 585 liters.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Škoda Enyaq
Changan Deepal S07 or Škoda Enyaq — who wins where
Škoda Enyaq leads 7 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Enyaq +106 km
- Battery kWhChangan Deepal S07 +3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Enyaq −3.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Enyaq +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Enyaq −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWŠkoda Enyaq +43 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Enyaq −7 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Enyaq +75 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Škoda Enyaq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S07 RWD |  Škoda Enyaq85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 475 km | 581 km | Škoda +106 km |
| Battery | 79.97 kWh | 77 kWh | Changan +3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 14.9 kWh/100 km | Škoda −3.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 92 kW | 135 kW | Škoda +43 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 35 min 30–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 7 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.8 km/min | 14.5 km/min | Škoda +7.7 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 6.7 s | Škoda −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2073 kg | 2066 kg | Škoda −7 kg |
| Boot | 510 l | 585 l | Škoda +75 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Changan |
| Length | 4750 mm | 4658 mm | Changan +92 mm |
| Width | 1930 mm | 1879 mm | Changan +51 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1622 mm | Changan +3 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2766 mm | Changan +134 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S07
Škoda Enyaq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S07
Škoda Enyaq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S07 or Škoda Enyaq?
The Škoda Enyaq goes further: 581 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 106 km.
Why does the Changan Deepal S07 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Škoda Enyaq?
The Changan Deepal S07 carries 79.97 kWh and covers 475 km, while the Škoda Enyaq with its 77 kWh battery does 581 km. Energy use decides it: 18.6 against 14.9 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S07 — its 79.97 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Enyaq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Enyaq takes more: 585 l against 510 l in the Changan Deepal S07. The difference is 75 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.