Changan Deepal S07 vs Mercedes GLC
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Mercedes GLC 330 kW · Power — Changan Deepal S07 218 PS, Mercedes GLC 490 PS · 0–100 km/h — Changan Deepal S07 7.9 s, Mercedes GLC 4.3 s.
Changan Deepal S07
The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.
Mercedes GLC
The Mercedes GLC is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering both rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as a long driving range.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Mercedes GLC
- Changan Deepal S07RWD
Mercedes GLCGLC 400 4MATIC
Changan Deepal S07 or Mercedes GLC — who wins where
Mercedes GLC leads 8 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes GLC +240 km
- Battery kWhMercedes GLC +14 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes GLC −3.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMercedes GLC +272 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes GLC −3.6 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes GLC +30 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes GLC +238 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S07 −387 kg
- Boot lMercedes GLC +60 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Mercedes GLC
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S07 RWD | Mercedes GLC GLC 400 4MATIC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 475 km | 715 km | Mercedes +240 km |
| Battery | 79.97 kWh | 94 kWh | Mercedes +14 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 14.9 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −3.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 92 kW | 330 kW | Mercedes +238 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 35 min 30–80% | 22 min 10–80% | 13 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.8 km/min | 22.7 km/min | Mercedes +15.9 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 490 PS | Mercedes +272 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 4.3 s | Mercedes −3.6 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 210 km/h | Mercedes +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2073 kg | 2460 kg | Changan −387 kg |
| Boot | 510 l | 570 l | Mercedes +60 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Changan |
| Length | 4750 mm | 4845 mm | Mercedes +95 mm |
| Width | 1930 mm | 1913 mm | Changan +17 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1644 mm | Mercedes +19 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2972 mm | Mercedes +72 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S07
Mercedes GLC
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S07
Mercedes GLC
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S07 or Mercedes GLC?
The Mercedes GLC goes further: 715 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 240 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Changan Deepal S07 and the Mercedes GLC differ?
The Changan Deepal S07 has RWD and 218 PS. The Mercedes GLC has AWD and 490 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S07 — its 79.97 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes GLC, with 94 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Changan Deepal S07 or Mercedes GLC?
The Mercedes GLC is stronger: 490 PS against the 218 PS of the Changan Deepal S07. The gap is 272 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.