Changan Deepal S07 vs Mazda CX-6e

Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Mazda CX-6e 195 kW · Boot — Changan Deepal S07 510 l, Mazda CX-6e 363 l · Power — Changan Deepal S07 218 PS, Mazda CX-6e 258 PS.

Changan Deepal S07

The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e is a D-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 484 km in the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging capabilities.

Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Mazda CX-6e

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Changan Deepal S07 or Mazda CX-6e — who wins where

It's a tie: 4 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMazda CX-6e +9 km
    Changan Deepal S07
    475
    Mazda CX-6e
    484
  • Battery kWhChangan Deepal S07 +2 kWh
    Changan Deepal S07
    79.97
    Mazda CX-6e
    78
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S07 −0.3 kWh/100 km
    Changan Deepal S07
    18.6
    Mazda CX-6e
    18.9
  • Power PSMazda CX-6e +40 PS
    Changan Deepal S07
    218
    Mazda CX-6e
    258
  • 0–100 km/h sNo difference
    Changan Deepal S07
    7.9
    Mazda CX-6e
    7.9
  • Top speed km/hMazda CX-6e +5 km/h
    Changan Deepal S07
    180
    Mazda CX-6e
    185
  • DC charging kWMazda CX-6e +103 kW
    Changan Deepal S07
    92
    Mazda CX-6e
    195
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Changan Deepal S07
    11
    Mazda CX-6e
    11
  • Weight kgChangan Deepal S07 −57 kg
    Changan Deepal S07
    2073
    Mazda CX-6e
    2130
  • Boot lChangan Deepal S07 +147 l
    Changan Deepal S07
    510
    Mazda CX-6e
    363

Add a third car

Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Mazda CX-6e

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Mazda CX-6e
Key parameters Changan Deepal S07
RWD
Mazda CX-6e
Takumi
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range475 km484 kmMazda +9 km
Battery79.97 kWh78 kWhChangan +2 kWh
Consumption18.6 kWh/100 km18.9 kWh/100 kmChangan −0.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging92 kW195 kWMazda +103 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 35 min 30–80%24 min 10–80%11 min
Range per minute of charging6.8 km/min14.1 km/minMazda +7.3 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power218 PS258 PSMazda +40 PS
0–100 km/h7.9 s7.9 sNo difference
Top speed180 km/h185 km/hMazda +5 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2073 kg2130 kgChangan −57 kg
Boot510 l363 lChangan +147 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4750 mm4850 mmMazda +100 mm
Width1930 mm1935 mmMazda +5 mm
Height1625 mm1620 mmChangan +5 mm
Wheelbase2900 mm2902 mmMazda +2 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Changan Deepal S07

Cost per 100 km5.58
Monthly70
Yearly837

Mazda CX-6e

Cost per 100 km5.67
Monthly71
Yearly850

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Changan Deepal S07

Mazda CX-6e

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the Changan Deepal S07 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mazda CX-6e?

The Changan Deepal S07 carries 79.97 kWh and covers 475 km, while the Mazda CX-6e with its 78 kWh battery does 484 km. Energy use decides it: 18.6 against 18.9 kWh/100 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Changan Deepal S07 takes more: 510 l against 363 l in the Mazda CX-6e. The difference is 147 l.

Which charges faster?

The Changan Deepal S07 accepts up to 92 kW DC, the Mazda CX-6e up to 195 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.