Changan Deepal S07 vs Leapmotor C10
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Leapmotor C10 180 kW · Charging 30–80% — Changan Deepal S07 35 min, Leapmotor C10 22 min · Power — Changan Deepal S07 218 PS, Leapmotor C10 299 PS.
Changan Deepal S07
The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.
Leapmotor C10
The Leapmotor C10 is an SUV in the D segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and performance specifications.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Leapmotor C10
- Changan Deepal S07RWD
Leapmotor C10Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh)
Changan Deepal S07 or Leapmotor C10 — who wins where
Leapmotor C10 leads 8 to 0
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLeapmotor C10 +35 km
- Battery kWhLeapmotor C10 +1.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLeapmotor C10 −0.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLeapmotor C10 +81 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLeapmotor C10 −1.7 s
- Top speed km/hLeapmotor C10 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWLeapmotor C10 +88 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minLeapmotor C10 −13 min
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Leapmotor C10
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S07 RWD | Leapmotor C10 Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 475 km | 510 km | Leapmotor +35 km |
| Battery | 79.97 kWh | 81.9 kWh | Leapmotor +1.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 18 kWh/100 km | Leapmotor −0.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 92 kW | 180 kW | Leapmotor +88 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 30–80% ↓ | 35 min | 22 min | Leapmotor −13 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.8 km/min | 11.6 km/min | Leapmotor +4.8 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 299 PS | Leapmotor +81 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 6.2 s | Leapmotor −1.7 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 190 km/h | Leapmotor +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2073 kg | — | — |
| Boot | 510 l | — | — |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4750 mm | 4739 mm | Changan +11 mm |
| Width | 1930 mm | 1900 mm | Changan +30 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1680 mm | Leapmotor +55 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2825 mm | Changan +75 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S07
Leapmotor C10
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S07
Leapmotor C10
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S07 or Leapmotor C10?
The Leapmotor C10 goes further: 510 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 35 km.
Which is more powerful — Changan Deepal S07 or Leapmotor C10?
The Leapmotor C10 is stronger: 299 PS against the 218 PS of the Changan Deepal S07. The gap is 81 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S07 accepts up to 92 kW DC, the Leapmotor C10 up to 180 kW. Charging from 30 to 80% takes 35 and 22 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Leapmotor C10 uses less electricity: 18 kWh/100 km against 18.6 kWh/100 km in the Changan Deepal S07. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 90 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.