Changan Deepal S07 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Ford Mustang Mach-E 150 kW · Power — Changan Deepal S07 218 PS, Ford Mustang Mach-E 294 PS · 0–100 km/h — Changan Deepal S07 7.9 s, Ford Mustang Mach-E 6.2 s.
Changan Deepal S07
The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV offering four different powertrain and battery configurations with WLTP ranges from 470 to 600 km.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
- Changan Deepal S07RWD
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD
Changan Deepal S07 or Ford Mustang Mach-E — who wins where
Ford Mustang Mach-E leads 6 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmFord Mustang Mach-E +125 km
- Battery kWhFord Mustang Mach-E +11 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Mustang Mach-E −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSFord Mustang Mach-E +76 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sFord Mustang Mach-E −1.7 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWFord Mustang Mach-E +58 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S07 −56 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S07 +108 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S07 RWD | Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 475 km | 600 km | Ford +125 km |
| Battery | 79.97 kWh | 91 kWh | Ford +11 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 17.5 kWh/100 km | Ford −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 92 kW | 150 kW | Ford +58 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 35 min 30–80% | 36 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.8 km/min | 11.7 km/min | Ford +4.9 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 294 PS | Ford +76 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 6.2 s | Ford −1.7 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2073 kg | 2129 kg | Changan −56 kg |
| Boot | 510 l | 402 l | Changan +108 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Changan |
| Length | 4750 mm | 4713 mm | Changan +37 mm |
| Width | 1930 mm | 1881 mm | Changan +49 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1597 mm | Changan +28 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2984 mm | Ford +84 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S07
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S07
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S07 or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E goes further: 600 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 125 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S07 — its 79.97 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Ford Mustang Mach-E, with 91 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Changan Deepal S07 or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is stronger: 294 PS against the 218 PS of the Changan Deepal S07. The gap is 76 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Changan Deepal S07 takes more: 510 l against 402 l in the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The difference is 108 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.