Changan Deepal S07 vs Ford Explorer
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Ford Explorer 135 kW · Power — Changan Deepal S07 218 PS, Ford Explorer 286 PS · Consumption — Changan Deepal S07 18.6 kWh/100 km, Ford Explorer 14.5 kWh/100 km.
Changan Deepal S07
The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.
Ford Explorer
The Ford Explorer is an SUV in the D-segment, offering three versions with electric powertrains, one of which, the Extended Range model, provides a range exceeding 560 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Ford Explorer
- Changan Deepal S07RWD
Ford ExplorerExtended Range RWD
Changan Deepal S07 or Ford Explorer — who wins where
Ford Explorer leads 6 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmFord Explorer +127 km
- Battery kWhChangan Deepal S07 +3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Explorer −4.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSFord Explorer +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sFord Explorer −1.5 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWFord Explorer +43 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgFord Explorer −58 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S07 +40 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Ford Explorer
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S07 RWD | Ford Explorer Extended Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 475 km | 602 km | Ford +127 km |
| Battery | 79.97 kWh | 77 kWh | Changan +3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 14.5 kWh/100 km | Ford −4.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 92 kW | 135 kW | Ford +43 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 35 min 30–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 7 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.8 km/min | 15.1 km/min | Ford +8.3 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 286 PS | Ford +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 6.4 s | Ford −1.5 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2073 kg | 2015 kg | Ford −58 kg |
| Boot | 510 l | 470 l | Changan +40 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Changan |
| Length | 4750 mm | 4468 mm | Changan +282 mm |
| Width | 1930 mm | 1872 mm | Changan +58 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1630 mm | Ford +5 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2767 mm | Changan +133 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S07
Ford Explorer
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S07
Ford Explorer
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S07 or Ford Explorer?
The Ford Explorer goes further: 602 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 127 km.
Why does the Changan Deepal S07 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Ford Explorer?
The Changan Deepal S07 carries 79.97 kWh and covers 475 km, while the Ford Explorer with its 77 kWh battery does 602 km. Energy use decides it: 18.6 against 14.5 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S07 — its 79.97 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Ford Explorer, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S07 accepts up to 92 kW DC, the Ford Explorer up to 135 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.