Cadillac Vistiq vs Maserati Grecale Folgore
Biggest differences: AC charging — Cadillac Vistiq 11 kW, Maserati Grecale Folgore 22 kW · Boot — Cadillac Vistiq 297 l, Maserati Grecale Folgore 535 l · DC charging — Cadillac Vistiq 190 kW, Maserati Grecale Folgore 150 kW.
Cadillac Vistiq
The Cadillac Vistiq is an electric SUV in the E segment with AWD drive, offering a range of 460 km according to the WLTP cycle and acceleration to 100 km/h in 3.9 seconds.
Maserati Grecale Folgore
The Maserati Grecale Folgore is an all-wheel-drive electric SUV offering a WLTP range of 580 kilometers and a power output of 557 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Cadillac Vistiq vs Maserati Grecale Folgore
Cadillac VistiqAWD
Maserati Grecale Folgore105 kWh AWD
Cadillac Vistiq or Maserati Grecale Folgore — who wins where
Maserati Grecale Folgore leads 7 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMaserati Grecale Folgore +120 km
- Battery kWhMaserati Grecale Folgore +3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMaserati Grecale Folgore −0.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSCadillac Vistiq +67 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sCadillac Vistiq −0.2 s
- Top speed km/hMaserati Grecale Folgore +10 km/h
- DC charging kWCadillac Vistiq +40 kW
- AC charging kWMaserati Grecale Folgore +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgMaserati Grecale Folgore −344 kg
- Boot lMaserati Grecale Folgore +238 l
Technical data: Cadillac Vistiq vs Maserati Grecale Folgore
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Cadillac Vistiq AWD | Maserati Grecale Folgore 105 kWh AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 460 km | 580 km | Maserati +120 km |
| Battery | 102 kWh | 105 kWh | Maserati +3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 21.8 kWh/100 km | 20.9 kWh/100 km | Maserati −0.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 190 kW | 150 kW | Cadillac +40 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Maserati +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | — | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 624 PS | 557 PS | Cadillac +67 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.9 s | 4.1 s | Cadillac −0.2 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 220 km/h | Maserati +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2899 kg | 2555 kg | Maserati −344 kg |
| Boot | 297 l | 535 l | Maserati +238 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Cadillac |
| Length | 5216 mm | 4865 mm | Cadillac +351 mm |
| Width | 2026 mm | 1948 mm | Cadillac +78 mm |
| Height | 1787 mm | 1651 mm | Cadillac +136 mm |
| Wheelbase | — | 2903 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Cadillac Vistiq
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Cadillac Vistiq
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Cadillac Vistiq or Maserati Grecale Folgore?
The Maserati Grecale Folgore goes further: 580 km WLTP against the 460 km of the Cadillac Vistiq. That is a difference of 120 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Cadillac Vistiq — its 102 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Maserati Grecale Folgore, with 105 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Maserati Grecale Folgore takes more: 535 l against 297 l in the Cadillac Vistiq. The difference is 238 l.
Which charges faster?
The Cadillac Vistiq accepts up to 190 kW DC, the Maserati Grecale Folgore up to 150 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.